this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
38 points (95.2% liked)

Gaming

24293 readers
112 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a merely 3 year old PC I bought for 1500€ a 5600x and 3060ti, yet it for some reason can't run cronos, a single player linear game, on low settings without constant lags

The whole game consists of grayscale. There is simply nothing that would require the computing power

And its not really a realistic progress of computing requirements, while they state that my entry level ryzen 5 5600x can run it on optimal settings, for some reason they require an extremely up to date GPU, which just tells me that they just crammed in every kind of graphics tech so their Grayscale smog looks better

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SammyJK@programming.dev 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

When game developers noticed the market for GPUs is growing and processing in general are getting more advanced, they started to care less about optimizing their games. That's literally it. It's laziness.

There are still devs that do their best to really optimize their games but most studios, especially AAA ones don't care.

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Developers deserve some blame, but Nvidia does a lot of work to get them to use their proprietary stuff that inly runs "well" on their most recent, high-end GPUs.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It’s not laziness, that’s always been a stupid oversimplification. The workers work hard on your entertainment product. It‘s a business decision.

[–] GalacticDeep@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When hearing laziness that’s always been my assumption. Laziness due to business.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Laziness implies that the workers who make the actual games are lazy which is obviously not true, unfair and audacious. Just use the right words.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It‘s a business decision

To what end?

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To optimise project parameters.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other words, to take a shortcut to avoid expending resources at the cost of quality.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. It‘s basic theory. Everyone does it all the time and you‘ll always find a customer/user who will say that some aspect of quality has been reduced too much.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 2 points 1 day ago

It's pedantry really. No one thought they meant the devs just didn't feel like optimizing it.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago

Yeah! Check out the impossible port videos by modern vintage gamer.

It really shows how well games could run on older hardware if devs cared to optimize it.

With that being said, someone is porting Mario 64 to the gameboy advance by super optimizing it.