this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1260 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys' opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] v81@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I like the Fairphone 5 but €40 for a case is unforgivable.

I'm feeling like it's a gouge because they know not many (if any) 3rd party cases exist.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you look at other recyclable or sustainable phone cases it's not actually that much expensive. It seems unreasonably priced if you compare them to cases that are not at all eco friendly.

[–] v81@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I have already made that comparison, and still have found it double the price of other cases that you describe.

Cases from recycled materials should be cheaper, as they are don't having to purchase virgin material, not more expensive.

Anyone charging a premium for recycled material products is usually targeting and taking advantage of 'green' customers.

The ability to recycle most plastics in 2023 is pretty standard unless they're overly cleaning or bleaching the material, in which case it is no longer environmentally friendly.

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Hey now, you're looking at this all wrong: if you break your phone because you didn't have a case on, it should be easily fixable! ;⁠-⁠)

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I have a FP5 and honestly:

You don't want a case. Seriously.

Just get one of the Screen Protectors and you're good to go.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have just recently bought a FP5 as well and I wouldn't trust myself without it. Without a case it's pretty slippery. And just because it's easy to repair the screen doesn't mean I risk it getting broken more than necessary. So the 34 Euro I paid definitely was worth it. Especially considering it's made out of recycled material.

I feared that the fingerprint reader would be hard to reach with it, but luckily it works pretty well. A slight touch is enough to unlock it.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

That's why i put on a screen protector. It protects the screen, realistically the only external part that matters, and doesn't really bulk the phone.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I've never in my life wanted a case. What's the point?

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When i got my FP4 I 3D printed my case with some flexable filament. Once the price went town (and the first case was full of full of dirt and dog food) I bought a cheaper one.

[–] Aleric@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hitting the dirt and dog food goal really is the biggest factor for case replacement in my house.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yah, it was a bad print with very porous layers, but it worked... For a while