Yeah I don't think I need further "evidence" to informally label someone a sociopath for hoarding wealth and behaving like a monster towards children. I never claimed to be a psychologist qualified to diagnose people nor that my comment acts as a formal medical diagnosis in any way. Stop acting like the bastards defamation lawyer.

in a way that you took pains to clarify was literal by saying "biological" this and "brain structure" that

Ok this is cope and the least charitable interpretation of what I wrote.

So, to re iterate, the dbzero person said the kid isn't a victim.

I replied saying that no it isn't about the kid, it's more about the millionaire's abhorrent behaviour that can be possibly explained by both "psychopathy", which has a biological cause (never stated that it's the only cause because that's wrong) and the guys class position.

Again this isn't me formally, medically, diagnosing the millionaire on any authority, that would be wrong and stupid, you are absolutely correct. I am using the label "psychopath"/"sociopath" as a shorthand for demonstrating really fucked up, damaging behaviour to the extent that it's reasonable to assume the person may have an inherent condition partly caused by biological factors.

On one hand, I apologize for not being sufficiently clear and hedging my statements enough to demonstrate that I am not offering any form of formal, serious, medical diagnosis.

On the other hand, I thought it was reasonable to assume the latter statement about randoms shit posting about how millionaires are bad.

can you see why some people might take umbrage with that?

Because they are experts in the field and are frustrated by flippant use of their subject area's terminology? Other than that I genuinely have no idea other than that they have been formally diagnosed with ASPD and take offense.