this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
738 points (96.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

36926 readers
2234 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An hour spent commuting is 1/16th of your daily life, and that hour is by far the biggest risk to your life every day. You should be getting triple pay to ameliorate the hazard risk it represents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 80 points 3 days ago (4 children)

When they started pushing for $15 federal minimum, it should have been $50.

Today, it should be about $150.

At $150/hr, you could afford to buy a an average home with a years pay.

People don't realize how insanely bad it's been getting.

I disagree that we should be paid triple to travel. We should just be paid appropriately. That's all.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ok, so we have a lot effed up in our system right now and I'm not trying to discount that. But this is like high school economics level stuff when I ask...

At $150/hr, you could afford to buy a an average home with a years pay.

Between the lowered supply of creating houses (in that it becomes more expensive to produce a house because everyone is getting paid a hell of a lot more) and the increased demand for housing because everyone has a bigger number in their bank account... Do you really expect that housing prices would just... Stay the same?

I'm also curious when any society at any point in history has been able to sustain decent housing with about a year's worth of wages?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Agreed. My wife and I are doing pretty well and we don't even make anywhere near $150/hr combined. Maybe in the Bay and NYC that wage would make sense but not most places. Making that the minimum wage would just cause a ton of inflation and put most people back at square one.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago

Maybe not one year, but it looks like a median home in the US in 1965 cost around 6 years of a median income.

In the 1854 book Walden by Thoreau, he gives a pessimistic account of how long it would take to afford a property in a town, that is still less than today:

An average house in this neighborhood costs perhaps eight hundred dollars, and to lay up this sum will take from ten to fifteen years of the laborer's life, even if he is not encumbered with a family- estimating the pecuniary value of every man's labor at one dollar a day, for if some receive more, others receive less

Although he goes on to describe building his own more remote cabin for $28.

Something is very, very wrong with incomes and housing prices currently that wasn't as bad a problem in the past.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

thats a bit out there but in terms of eggs I estimate minimum wage if it was the same when I was young would be somewhere between $45 and $75 per hour. It still amazes me how much money I was paid back then as a high school student.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You're out of your mind if you think a $300k salary for every working citizen is feasible. Paying that out would require $53 trillion, which is more than our GDP.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's the thing though, the number doesn't matter.

We have people starving and then we have people traveling to the other side of the planet to throw a wedding that could feed millions of people.

Fuck a number, fuck money, eat the rich then we can all eat and live wherever we want.

Sometimes I think about trying to buy a tiny home or a single wide, and then 5 seconds later, I realize that its just not going to fucking happen. That's an insane thought. If we don't start hitting the streets soon, we're all going to lose.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The company is probably going to charge their customers even more for the work you do in your working time.

Someone already pays that money. The workers just don't receive it.

If everybody was self-employed, those are the prices that would be paid.

I agree up to the extent of the numbers. I think $50/hr is feasible if we make drastic changes to our economy. $150/hr simply cannot work with the country's current number of workers and overall productivity.

[–] flueterflam@lemmy.world -5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

$150 per hour? I'm in salaried software engineering and barely making a third of that after a promotion.

If what you propose happens, all the prices of everything would skyrocket... It seems good on paper, but it ignores all the greed of capitalism..

For better or worse, (the latter for rich folks...) there "needs" to be tiers of incomes (in Capitalism). Bumping the minimum just bumps the prices. We've already experience it with minimum wage bumps in the US. We don't have an actual solution that works at the moment in the US because minimum wage increases automatically lead to greedier CEOs.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I mean, I agree with a lot of what you said but also we haven't had any federal minimum wage bumps in a decade and a half. States that follow federal minimum wage haven't exactly kept their cost of living frozen.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

You have to admit that what you are getting paid is to low though considering what it takes to do what you do. Even doctors and lawyers are not making what they should as the issue is at the extreme top.