this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1235 points (96.9% liked)

interestingasfuck

8010 readers
10 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Them being forced to include these terms is a win in and of itself, but it still protects people who otherwise had no protections even if they didn't use these services.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I fear it would be a pyrrhic victory at best; all it takes is one instance of acceptance (via smartphone update, or an infinite number of other avenues) for it to propagate to every other entity.

That’s actually before encountering ownership issues of photos, as it usually is the photographer who owns the copyright to an image - and if they upload that photo to a service and agree for it to be trained upon; what happens next?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you might be overestimating cooperation between these companies, but it's definitely a valid concern.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Probably, yes - but in a race for as much data as possible to try and feed their LLM models, I wouldn’t put it past them.