this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
230 points (98.7% liked)

science

21301 readers
108 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

There's no "safe" level of sunlight, even if you wear sunscreen.

[–] unknown@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but you don't have to drink alcohol to live.

Going outside is unavoidable and using sunscreen, long clothing and a hat, protects you from a lot of the radiation damage.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most outdoor activities are avoidable. Avoiding those activities entirely is safer than wearing protection.

[–] unknown@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Indoor humans represent!

If outside was completely avoidable, I absolutely would.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

To each their own.

Personally, I don't mind sitting outside in the sun. It's a good place to have a beer.

[–] ziltoid101@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

10 minutes of sun per day is typically less likely to give you cancer than 0 minutes. Vitamin D (and other compounds involved in the synthesis from cholesterol that you won't get in supplements) upregulate DNA repair polymerases that protect against carcinogens. Of course after a few minutes the costs of UV exposure outweight this benefit though.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Try living with out getting any sunlight

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You could certainly try to keep your sunlight exposure to a bare minimum.

Or you can just weigh the inherent risks of doing things you enjoy.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That is a highly myopic, frankly stupid, opinion that isn't even yours - you're just repeating things that you heard.

The deleterious health effects from not getting sun exposure vastly outweigh the potential DNA damage from sun exposure.

[–] unknown@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Can you quote the section of my comment that has gotten you so upset please?

I want to know exactly which bit of what I wrote instigated this response, so I know how to reply properly.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I take plenty of vitamin D every day

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What deleterious health effects from not getting sun exposure?

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vitamin D deficiency. Rickets. Osteopathic problems. Seasonal Affective Disorder. Weight gain. Etc.

https://distance.physiology.med.ufl.edu/what-are-the-effects-of-not-getting-enough-sunlight/

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They make vitamin D pills

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can get the RDA of vitamin D from a healthy diet, without need for sunlight.

Weight gain is caused by diet and lack of exercise, not lack of sunlight.

SAD can be treated with non-carcinogenic lamps.