this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
94 points (92.7% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

18194 readers
65 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iii@mander.xyz 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If any member is attacked, every other member has to come to their aid.

They don't have to. It stipulates that a war on one member is viewed as a declaration of war on all members. But there's no protocol that forces members to act.

For example when the Cypriot war broke out between Greece and Turkey, both NATO members.

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Then it would make such membership meaningless and will only undermine collective action within NATO?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

It is what it is

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, in practice this is interpreted as as everyone must join to retaliate, except maybe in niche cases like the aggressor also being in NATO.