this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8591 readers
221 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396125

Stephen Starr in Hamtramck, Michigan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 11.00 EDT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She had so many chances to make this election easier. Could have had a Palestinian talk during the DNC, and that would have likely changed this story.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You'd have to be an idiot to make another countries conflict an election issue, when neither candidate supports your side. The fact that neither candidate is pro Palestine, it's a moot point in terms of the election

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is this a joke? This genocide is as much our “conflict” as it is Israel’s, given that Israel wouldn’t be able to do what it’s doing without massive US financial, materiel, and political support. It’s absolutely an election issue. You can say it’s not ’till the cows come home, but uncommitted is as real as death & taxes.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, a conflict where USA supply weapons and all other manners of support used for open genocide (btw illegally, US law declare US need to stop in such case, but Blinken and co blocked it) and is even sending US soldiers to serve as a missile bait, isn't an issue for US voters according to you?

Nice democracy you think they should have there.

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’d have to be an idiot to make another countries conflict an election issue

apply this to Ukraine :)