this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
12 points (64.3% liked)
World News
37246 readers
290 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Working against imperialism for selfish, pragmatic reasons, is still anti-imperialist. There isn't an ideological basis for it, sure, but the actions fundamentally undermine global imperialism as the primary obstacle towards global socialism.
As for jackeroni posting pro-Russian sources, they've stated that they intend on making the information field more even than purely using western sources. Exposure to non-western points of view is helpful analysis.
As a side note, there's no need to say "Mr/Ms." You can just say "they," use the usernames, or use the listed pronouns if people have them.
The Russo-Ukrainian War has generally not worked out in the west's favor, and the resources tied up in it have allowed countries in the global south to align themselves more with the PRC or even pursue national sovereignty, like Burkina Faso. Further, the Russo-Ukrainian War has shown that the west is severely deficient in industrial production, the west has flashy toys but can't field them for long. It hasn't strengthened the imperialist bourgeoisie, in fact it's been more of an increase in imperial overhead costs in keeping the system going.
As for jackeroni's agenda, they are pro-Russian in the Russo-Ukrainian War. I wasn't trying to argue against that point. I disagree with the appeared implication that jackeroni is paid propaganda, they haven't made that seem apparent and sufficient evidence is needed, but if your point is that being pro-Russian means the post itself should be discarded I also disagree. Careful analysis of the facts at hand requires looking at all sides, which is something I think you're agreeing with.
I don't follow, if Russia is fundamentally opposed to western imperialism for its own selfish, pragmatic, even existential reasons, then it's working against imperialism. Russia is not allowed to be a cog in the imperial machine, it asked to be allowed in 2 and a half decades ago but was denied. Russia is a bourgeois nationalist country, sure, it isn't a beacon of socialism, but it's backed into a corner and forced into working with socialist countries like the PRC and working against global imperialism just to continue existing. Russia can't be an empire, it has neither the colonies to extract from nor the financial capital to do so.
As for being propaganda or not, do you list, say, the NYT as western propaganda in the comments too? I think most people are capable of recognizing pro-Russian and anti-Russian sources at this point, so I'm not quite sure what point you're serving other than to draw additonal emphasis.
I'm a Marxist-Leninist, I'm using Lenin's analysis of imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism. The global north/south divide is imperialism. Russia is not the only country incentivized more to work against the global system of western hegemony, the entire global south stands to gain. Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism, but isn't synonymous with private property. Imperialism is currently a system by which the west loots and plunders the world through massive financial capital and uses millitary force to cement this system. It's why most goods are produced in the global south yet consumed in the global north. Russia isn't a benefactor of that system, it isn't a participant, and is materially incentivized into working against it despite relying on private property because its kept out of it.
Anti-imperialism is about fighting imperialism. We cannot fundamentally progress towards fighting private property without accurately analyzing and engaging the system that most directly perpetuates it globally. Countries in the global south are intentionally underdeveloped to keep them under the thumb of empire, and are attacked with force if they express sovereignty and lack nukes.
As for pointing out when the media is biased, it always is. Bias isn't avoidable. There's hidden bias and overt bias, it's important to distinguish but ultimately all media is told from a viewpoint and with an agenda.
I truly don't see how a bunch of NATO equipment being destroyed and a significant amount of western resources being poured in as overhead costs is somehow maintaining the status quo. Palestinian liberation heated up, economic ties to the PRC increased, Russia was further economically isolated from the west and had to solidify its alliances further with anti-imperialist countries, and more.
Imperialism isn't a system that everyone perpetuates and participates in. The largest obstacle in the world for any country building socialism, like Cuba, the PRC, or even socialist states that don't exist yet, is the US Empire and western imperialism in general. There is a clear set of benefactors of this global plunder, the global north, and a clear set of victims, the global south. In order to build socialism, we must overcome that system, and that requires us to struggle against it, countries in the global south to break free (like Burkina Faso is doing), etc, and those tasks are halted if NATO is given free reign and imperial resources are itching to be used.
Russia isn't ideologically working against imperialism, but it does do because it needs to to survive.
The west is heavily de-industrialized. There's increased demand for millitary equipment, but very little in the way of factories to reproduce them. Palestine has benefited massively from the west not being able to fully commit to Israel, as an example. There just aren't the actual factories necessary to continue to front proxy wars for NATO, again, big flashy toys but no real industry to keep fielding them. It's the cost of empire increasing. I cannot fathom a world where this is benefiting empire, just like how the cost of maintaining empire increasing led to the collapse of the British Empire and the rise of the US Empire.
As for Russia benefiting from imperialism, no, not really. The vast bulk of Russia's capital exports are for tax havens. Russia has billionaires and the ultra-wealthy, but is absolutely sidelined by the west and is blocked out of looting and plundering the global south because of it. Also, selling the west gas isn't the same as plundering the global south through financial domination, trade isn't imperialism.
As for toxicity, I can't really say I agree. Don't put too much stock into downvotes, but at the same time, try to reconsider your own positions.
Imagine acting this way and being pressed that people are being toxic to you. There's no one in the world who could have been more patient with you and you turn around in spit in their face like this while complaining about the toxicity of the sub.
You haven't been met with a fraction of hostility and downvotes you deserve. You showed up in the first place to be a vapid piece of shit troll and you haven't changed your attitude since. I sincerely hope you make good on your threat and fuck off forever.
feel free to provide free entertainment for the rest of us any time
Lol
I hOpE yOU fINd hApPIneSS sOmeDAy
I do both, thanks for the concern.