this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
17 points (77.4% liked)

Asklemmy

50112 readers
694 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've often heard that China is authoritarian, particularly due to events like the suppression of student protests in Hong Kong. However, I'm curious about more recent examples. Conversely, I've been hearing about the UK's Online Safety Act being used to target Wikipedia editors and silence protests, which raises questions about authoritarian tendencies there as well. What specific examples do you have that demonstrate whether these countries are authoritarian or not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you still disappear if you are against the only (!) party in China? Do they still go after Chinese people outside(!) of China with police-like forces?

Does every country have some points that could be considered authoritarian? Sure, but let's not act as if the UK is anywhere near China on that scale.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are 8 other political parties beyond the CPC in China. They don't compete with the CPC, but cooperate, and exert their own interests. Over 90% of Chinese citizens support their government. The extent to which the average Chinese citizen can affect policy is greater than that of the average UK citizen, because democracy is more than just picking a party, but having the ability to pick and choose policy.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't think that number is surprising. Living in China e.g. 40 years ago would have sucked, so as mentioned in the article you posted, living conditions have basically continuously improved for people. I expect that number will drop in the upcoming decades (although IDK to what extent). It's worth noting the studies were basically pre-COVID.

Also, pointing out that China has other political parties is worthless since they basically can't do anything.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What gives you the impression that those satisfied with the government will drop, in the PRC?

As for pointing out that China has 1 main party and 8 smaller, more focused parties, I point it out because democracy doesn't need to look like a bunch of groups battling it out. Society can be run in a more cooperative manner. In the PRC, the minor parties are focused on specialized areas, and some parties even hold seats in the NPC.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cooperative? Mate, they simply put everyone who disagrees too much away. Having a choice is battling it out, having no choice to begin with is cooperation. How can we twist reality some more?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Why on Earth does democracy have to take the form of competition? Discussion and direction can be cooperative, you've done this hundreds of times in your life without needing to take an antagonistic stance.

[–] CoderSupreme@programming.dev 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

But I'm asking about real examples not made up ones. And if you are referring to secret services all countries have those.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] CoderSupreme@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

And of course you send me the article from a paper that's the mouthpiece of some US billionaire. Would you take it seriously if a chinese paper said the US 'secret police' is disappearing people? They are going to paint the worse possible picture since they are rivals.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

Would you take it seriously if a chinese paper said the US 'secret police' is disappearing people?

I mean, they are though.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It takes 0 effort to find other sources if you actually try to look this sort of stuff up. I feel like you've basically decided the answer and are just looking for people to validate your opinion.

[–] CoderSupreme@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I may have my mind made up, but I could change it if people said something more easily verified, like the kind of police brutality that happens in US, instead of people disappearing like the chinese has ufos contracted, that just sounds like conspiracy theories made up by the americans.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I find it sort of amusing that your example for the UK is the Online Safety Act given that China has the GFW. Like, I find the Online Safety Act problematic (along with a number of other things the UK has done), but the scale is barely even comparable lol.

[–] CoderSupreme@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

This is the kind of thing I'm looking for, not ufos disappearing people.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

Then search in Chinese or any other non-English language, what the fuck?

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hahaha you cited the NYT and the Guardian. Awesome sources. Your billionaire-owned β€œsources” mean nothing here.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good thing you dismiss what you disagree with without any further arguments. Waste someone else's time please.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Treating the NYT seriously, after watching it spend two years being to the Gaza Holocaust what Der Sturmer was to the original Holocaust, is obscene.