You are the one coming out with a topic stating that the art doesn't show the workers building it and is therefore fascist by default. Virtually no art other than socialist realism features the builder, and even most soviet architectural art doesn't feature any people to any significant extent. It is the same kind of tea leaf reading that you get when westerners call Stalinist or Chinese architecture totalitarian and evil by imagining the people who were enslaved to build it.

I wonder since the majority of the real world muscle behind the actual movement with forest cities and expanded solar power automation is currently in China. Like, another topic you just posted completely fits with the whole aestetic, but I assume it wasn't meant to be seen as terrible news.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think I was pretty clear in what I said above. Feel free to actually address that.

[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I did. You have blankly refused to answer any of my questions though, and instead decided to change the subject to the ideology that some proponents have so further interaction seems pointless.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 6 days ago

I love how you're upset that you didn't get the answer you were very obviously fishing for. Given that you don't care for what I actually have to say, you're right that further interaction is pointless.