this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
89 points (91.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13942 readers
669 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Esoteir@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

twitter users: is-this is this fascism?

[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

Shit, the Trots were right no-choice

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If that was the sum of Soviet aesthetic then you might even have a point. However, the bulk of Soviet art celebrates the worker. On the other hand, labour is entirely invisible in pretty much all the solar-punk aesthetic.

[–] Esoteir@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (106 children)

of the first eight image results on google, six of them have people in them, and of the ones that have people in them, 4/6 of them show labour idk what you're talkign about lmao

load more comments (106 replies)
[–] Esoteir@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

i apologize in advance, the maximum comment depth was reached, this comment is a reply to https://hexbear.net/comment/6331483

i brought it up as a counter example to the dispossessed on soviet sci-fi, before i ever called the dispossessed a foundational piece of solar-punk media

but i will agree that at the time, the concept of communism becoming a interstellar society was very real to those living in the USSR

in the material circumstance of ursula living in cold war era america, anarcho-syndicalism being applied to build socialism in a theoretical future interstellar capitalist system seemed much more plausible, which is also why the dispossessed had a second boost of popularity when solar-punk started up as a movement in between the dissolution of the USSR by capitalist encroachment and the rise of china as a second communist superpower

load more comments (5 replies)