this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
101 points (96.3% liked)
Asklemmy
50208 readers
608 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'd say charging cables / most kinds of wires.
People are used to and comfortable with wireless charging these days despite it being spotty in terms of availability.
Better charging rates and capacity to power larger appliances might end up with you having a completely wireless home.
I've heard this before. But the biggest downside of wireless charging for me is I can't use my device while it's charging. Wireless chargers in the vast majority of scenarios aren't even getting rid of wires. You still need to connect the wireless charger to the wall with a cable.
I agree but tech could improve
Not really. Power induction through air is inherently lossy. That's just physics.
If you don't require it to replace cables it doesn't need to. For adding some energy to the device while it's on your desk or nightstand it works perfectly fine.
The efficiency issue is also exaggerated, phones don't take much power to begin with. Anyone using AC or warm water for convenience is doing much worse in terms of spent energy.
I still fail to see the advantage of wireless charging. In both case a cable is involved.
Your Wi-Fi also needs a cable if you want to be pedantic.
The benefit is that there is no overhead involved, in theory you don't even have to think about charging your phone ever again. When it's not in use, just leave it on some of the dedicated places around the house and office that provide wireless charging.
Only true wireless charging would kill wired chargers. The so called wireless charger still need to be charged with a cable
Not going to happen, quite a few phones have 65W+ chargers nowadays which wireless can't replicate
Next ten years? Sounds more like a 50/100 year prediction