this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
249 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3156 readers
784 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The DNC is gonna work hard to destroy ranked choice voting, aren’t they?
If there were no ranked choice, he still would have won in this case. He won the plurality of the votes on the first round (unexpectedly and a massive over performance of the polls)
Granted ranked choice may have made more people feel safer to consider him in the first place, but still worth noting here
He probably would have still won but you can’t make that determination directly
Probably a lot of people voted for him as first because they could have another, more known option as option 2.
Like in the National elections imagine that there was ranked choice. A third party would get a significant amount of votes, maybe even surpassing the democrats, but without this ranked choice, the inertia is just too high and it’s too risky to vote for them.
They may not have to: there's already a push to "denaturalize citizens," and I'm pretty sure Mamdani is at or near the top of the list for that and subsequent deportation.
I kind of want this to happen if only because it might finally anger some Americans into action.
If they weren't going to act when their benefits were being taken away, they're never gonna act on principle
Nah no way it would
yes. ranked choice voting happened in alaska in 2020, and they tried but failed to repeal it in 2024.
although alaska isnt by means a left leaning state, the establishment does not like ranked choice voting
In NYC at least, that would require repealing the amendment to the City Charter - a move that would be extremely unpopular, given that the ballot measure to amend the charter for ranked-choice primaries passed with >70% support (or over 500,000 votes).
Already are.
Tune in to this reposted Atlantic article learn that RCV is "wonkish and confusing", that it has "warped the political calculus of the mayoral campaign" by causing candidates to (horror!) cross-endorse instead of dropping out or running attack ads. Clearly, the article concludes, if a newcomer can defeat a wealthy candidate with 'name recognition', the system must obviously be wrong.
they already are colluding with the gop.