this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1494 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

16050 readers
982 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Many ethnic minorities complain that their cultural heritage is exhibitioned in the capital far away. Countries are a social construct

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

doesn't mean crackers are off the hook for centuries of theft

[–] HowAbt2morrow 0 points 1 month ago

Mf’kin crackahs be trippin and shit.

[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you REALLY think a minority ethnic group in say, Nigeria, would rather have their artifacts locked away in London under the stewardship of Anglos rather than displayed in Lagos where they can at least visit it?

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't say that, how do people read that into my comment? I was giving additional context that it is not enough to bring it anywhere into the country. Sure, keeping it in London is worse, I never said it's better.

Many anti-colonial activists will point out that the modern day governments are the collaborators from back then and still they get the reparations and artifacts. Sure, keeping them in London is worse, I never defended that.

[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

My bad. But you can see how your comment reads like a whataboutism, right?

[–] pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So it's better to keep it somewhere thousands of kilometres away where they'll never be able to see it as compared to being able to see it albeit with difficulty?

That's an internal problem for them to solve, not an excuse to hoard someone else's culture.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I never said it's better to keep it but it's not enough to bring it somewhere in the country. Countries are a social construct so instead of focusing on boarders, bring it directly to the cultural heirs. Of cause keeping it is worse. If the capital is too far away, why would London be better?

Of cause keeping it is worse. If the capital is too far away, why would London be better?

Exactly. We agree there then.

Countries are a social construct so instead of focusing on boarders, bring it directly to the cultural heirs.

I think this tricky. Usually, I think the Cultural heritage belongs to the countries from where the artifacts were taken, so that's where the artifacts should be returned to. Otherwise, How do you decide who to give an artifact to? Most inhabitants of central America share Mayan ancestry, and they no longer follow the maya religion.

I guess it's a case to case basis. I am sure the rare cases in which there is a dispute it should be left upto the countries or institutions that claim the artifact to arbitrate.