this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
561 points (98.6% liked)

World News

47476 readers
2273 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mike Huckabee suggested any future Palestinian state should be carved out of ‘a Muslim country’

Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, has said that the US is no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state, marking what analysts describe as the most explicit abandonment yet of a cornerstone of US Middle East diplomacy.

Asked during an interview with Bloomberg News if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy, he replied: “I don’t think so.”

The former Arkansas governor chosen by Donald Trump as his envoy to Israel went further by suggesting that any future Palestinian entity could be carved out of “a Muslim country” rather than requiring Israel to cede territory.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Ok, so assume all things equal, everything happens the same in Gaza... Trump is still significantly worse in every other facet. So yea, all third party voters and non voters are fucking moronic Trump supporters. A bunch of ignorant fuckwits that think that they made a difference by standing up against the establishment. Congrats, we got Trump.

There's only so many ways to say that there were two outcomes last November, and everyone knew that. If y'all can't wrap your head around that reality 6 months later, then that says everything about your ability to reason.

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why I don't get is why the democrats ran a chicken race with democracy for a widely despised policy when they knew the stakes. We can call the electorate morons all day and even have point, but they are supposed to be smart.

[–] BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The why doesn't strike me as hard. A number of domestic voting blocks in critical swing states will mobilize hard against any perceived flagging of support of Israel. It will play poorly in the press broadly, and opponents will successfully fundraise on the issue.

The worst part is the party is being entirely realistic. Jeremy Corbyn showed what happens when a party leadership is not sufficiently supportive of Israel. Any left of center leader will be tagged as radical, but the accusations of harboring antisemitic elements lost labour what should have been a landslide victory.

Continuing to write Israel a blank check may be widely despised, but the left might hold their nose and vote blue anyway. The left is famously never satisfied, so what else is new?

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Even when Bidens line was far to the right of every previous admin besides Donalds? I have a hard time believing there wasn't a coalition holding line possible here when it was a majority possition.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 4 days ago

that’s absolutely true too! there are multiple parties who share the responsibility… as always, the world is complex and rarely are things black and white

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The most basic job responsibility of a politician is to get elected. Democrats' only platform is "at least we're not as bad as the other guys" but the other guys only get worse and worse while democrats follow along, making sure to be just different enough to make people think they have a choice, but not different enough to change the course of our country and its servitude to the ultra-rich.

You're arguing with people on here who most likely voted for Harris. I know I did. However, who I vote for doesn't matter when democrats are so bad at looking appealing and fighting for a winning chance that my vote is drowned out by others not paying attention or who are gerrymandered away (or otherwise suppressed).

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I'm specifically arguing with/against non voters, 3rd party voters, and Trump voters. I also pinched my nose and voted for Harris in November. I'm not going to argue for the democratic party, because it's the second worst major party in the US, and they suck. Unfortunately, we are a FPtP nation, so in the general we get two options and get to pick who's less bad. Lot's of people that voted for Harris did so with that in mind.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Doesn't matter what the Democrats platform was.

If they were concerned about Gaza and didn't vote Harris, then they didn't care about Gaza. Because of them Trump got elected like everyone told them, and made the situation in Gaza worse.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

If democrats were concerned about stopping trump and ignored voters, then they didn't care about stopping trump. Because of them trump got elected like everyone told them, and made the situation in Gaza worse.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The main argument was never "Trump is no worse than Harris". To argue against this is fighting windmills.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The argument has always been, of the two candidates, one of which will win, which is less bad? People that voted third party or didn't vote decided that Trump is less bad.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No it wasn't. That's disregarding a heap of systemic criticism and historical and moral considerations.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It was, because that's reality. It does disregard a lot of criticism, because again, at the end of the day, there were two candidates, and one was going to win. Harris wasn't, imo, a good candidate, but Trump was a far worse.

In the US, it's been that way for the better part of the past century, because FPtP always devolves to a two party system. This past election was no different.