this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
552 points (98.8% liked)

World News

47388 readers
1401 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mike Huckabee suggested any future Palestinian state should be carved out of ‘a Muslim country’

Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, has said that the US is no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state, marking what analysts describe as the most explicit abandonment yet of a cornerstone of US Middle East diplomacy.

Asked during an interview with Bloomberg News if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy, he replied: “I don’t think so.”

The former Arkansas governor chosen by Donald Trump as his envoy to Israel went further by suggesting that any future Palestinian entity could be carved out of “a Muslim country” rather than requiring Israel to cede territory.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bonus@piefed.social 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You know it's democracy when the policies of 340 million people can flip-flop based on the whims of a handful of moronic hateful shitbirds.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not the handful, unfortunately.

The handful has no real power.

The problem is that 49% on each side flip-flop based on whoever's in power, because their values and opinions are a matter of convenience, and perfectly easy to change with their preferred nightly news broadcast.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

It's not 49%. The split in 2024 was 1/3 R, 1/3 D, 1/3 didn't vote, and ~1% 3rd party.

As the other commenter said, it's a much fewer percentage of the population that sways those 1/3s either in the favor of R or D.

And you'd think Democrats would have chased after the 1/3 that sat at home instead of Rs, but we all know what actually happened

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're correct in the general sense. But it's not even 49%. It's basically 2-10% of the American electorate. They flip-flop based on their own myopic, selfish impulses, and whatever bullshit they've been fed by the media.

In 2016 they swung it for Trump because unlike his opponent he's a white guy, they didn't like Clinton, and because Trump's promises of cheaper gas for their big trucks would save them a bit of money each month.

In 2020 they swung for Biden because he's also a white guy, they had discovered Trump just caused chaos without really delivering any personal benefits to them, and Biden looked like the more stable option for their pocket book.

In 2024 they swung for Trump again because unlike his opponent he's a white guy, and they apparently have fucking goldfish memories.

Meanwhile, millions of other people in America and elsewhere in the world are being put through hell to a lesser or greater degree because of these people.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You know, I've definitely considered this criticism of most democracies for why dictatorship is such a dirty concept.

In a world where people can be herded like sheep and votes bought, dictators at least have the potential to go against the status quo.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The flaw of democracy is it requires an educated population to make correct decisions.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, authoritarian regimes are less stable than democracies.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is seems like a false statement. What you mean by stable exactly ?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Able to hand power over without bloody civil wars.

[–] hellequin67@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

USA 2020 enters the chat /s

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a very narrow view of stability.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Yes it is and dictatorships can't even jump that.