SkyNTP

joined 2 years ago
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yes and no. A lot of people are misinformed. It's easy to say not being misinformed is the responsibility of the individual, just like recycling plastic is the responsibility of the individual consumer. Reality is a bit more nuanced. Misinformed people often simply don't have access to good information or critical thinking skills to not be duped. Many others are straight up vulnerable to manipulation, through fears etc.

Democracy only works if people are informed. I think the American system has failed catastrophically to inform ordinary people.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Governments are the product of the people. There is no divine or natural laws that triggers "an election". A government is simply created from thin air when a group of people (any group of people) get together and say: fuck the old system, we are putting that in the trash and signing a new social contract.

Of course, there's virtually never unanimity of agreement over this social contract in one geographic area, so that social contract is only as binding as the force used to put it in effect.

Realistically, 6 months+ of government shutdown in the US will likely cause a collapse of the USA as a single unified federal entity, since the federal government effectively rots. At that point, all bets are off. A fracture of the US is very possible.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Broadly speaking this is probably true. In a smaller context, though, there are tons of counter examples. The internet for example, from just 10 years ago, was unquestionably better. AI slop, bots, enshitification, social media and browser monoculture...

The anti science trend of MAGA over the last few years...

Etc. Regression does happen, and we should not take things for granted.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I hear they are a solution to the problem of increasing mileage/efficiency. I am no fan of Tesla, but we have to admit, there is some merit to that argument, however debatable the efficiency benefits are.

That's not to say safety isn't a serious issue. The biggest problem is the reliance on electronics. Now if someone can reinvent the design with a highly reliable mechanical system, with multiple redundancy.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

Real life example of being blinded by "can we" instead of "should we". This society needs a great deal of introspection.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Define "never". Never in as in never in the history of 21st century America? Pretty tame assertion. Never in the anthropological sense? That would be completely farcical.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Reality check: you don't make boatloads of money for having useful skills everyone has (or should have). You make boat loads of money when you have useful skills that few people have.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Why stop at appliances? By that logic, humans are nothing more than self-propelled heaters. The whole universe is nothing but shifting pockets of heat like the ripples of a pond bouncing back and forth until they all disappear.

Such nihilism.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like the Narcissist's Prayer to me.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is how the United States of America turns into the States of America.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

A few hundred billionaires own more than the majority of Americans.

I think your assertion is factually incorrect. Or at least significantly overestimates how much ordinary Americans actually get to participate in America.

I think for most people, America has already collapsed, and that is exactly why they voted for Trump.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Here's the thing. Y'all sitting around waiting for the institutions to do their job. Y'all waiting for the institutions to do the right thing. But y'all institutions have been corrupted, so they ain't gonna do anything. It's up to you, the people to clean up house now, by sending a strong message. And it doesn't take that much to take action. There is incredible power in the people and in collective action. But for now it is locked away in tepid comfort. That comfort won't last though. It never does under tyranny.

 

This is currently my primary frustration with Connect: complete opaqueness regarding instances.

I understand that one design philosophy might argue that instances shouldn't matter, so why show it at all. But it does matter, especially on All, and in comments. I think at the current and near-term state of development, obscuring instances creates more confusion than it alleviates.

  • In this example, I have no idea what community this is. Where is "here"? "General" is a super broad category (does a multi-community even make sense for this type of community name?). Is this /c/general for a general purpose instance, or /c/general of an instance dedicated to a very specific topic? Is that instance worth checking out? Who knows?
  • Is this an instance I'm subscribed to yet?
  • is this the same /c/general I was in last time with a moderation policy and moderators I didn't like, or a new one?
  • Is my instance defederated from seal_of_approval and will they receive my message? Who knows?
  • Are most responders coming from lemmy.world, from sketchy instances loaded with bots or is there good traction from smaller instances? Is there instance brigading going on?
  • Is this an impersonator of seal_of_approval?
  • is this a specific community that spams a lot and I should block it?
  • What moderation rules apply to this instance?

I can't block entire instances myself...

I realize that a lot of these problems have some sort of workaround by drilling down into community details and profiles. Ain't nobody have time for that.

I realize that specific UI solutions could be introduced to tackle each of these problems individually in a user-friendly manner. But we're not there and who knows when we will get there.

view more: next ›