201
Elden Ring's player engagement is through the roof: 45% of its Steam players have played for 100+ hours
(alineaanalytics.com)
this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
201 points (95.5% liked)
Games
38867 readers
1552 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here and here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Categorizing this as engagement rather than just the number of people who finished the game seems incredibly stupid.
Because hours of play has no direct relationship with completion. Playing for 100+ hours doesn’t mean you’ve finished the game.
80 hours in and I'm nowhere near, I'm more likely to spin up a new character than to finish the thing
~~Almost 200hrs~~ 260 hrs in (i double checked haha), level 150, and im maybe 3/4 done. I was never interested in soul like games before, or video games in general, but something about the open world experience in elden ring just pulled me in. I honestly couldnt tell you most of the story or the boss names, but god damn it was and still is a fucking blast grinding out the fights to figure out the mechanics.
But you'll see similar rates of players finishing the game that have far shorter runtimes. 100 hours is about how long it takes to finish the game, after all, and that percentage lines up quite well with the achievements for finishing the game. Engagement is a horrible metric for a game like Elden Ring that isn't trying to keep you hooked with anything except a game you like playing; no battle pass, no dailies, no events, etc. I'll bet A Dance With Dragons has far better engagement metrics than The Return of the King, but it's a stupid metric regardless, because they're books.
NO direct relationship? maybe it’s not 1:1 but surely there is some kind of direct relationship.
Depends on your definition of "direct."
I've played around 1k hours of Europa Universalis IV and I've never completed a campaign (gotten to the last year in the game), because I find I've completed my goals about halfway or two thirds of the way through the time line. The same goes for most Civ games, I just quit and restart once I know I've won.
I imagine Elden Ring is similar for many people, they play a character for a couple dozen hours and restart with a new character.
a direct relationship means the variables increase or decrease with each other, but not necessarily in the same proportion.
Why are you guys arguing? The chart means exactly what it says. People who have played the game with more than 100+ hours. It says nothing about people who’ve finished the game.
There’s probably some sort of positive relationship between the two, but we’d need mire information.
why are YOU arguing?
that's literally all i was saying.
Lol ok
Yeah but if you haven’t finished new game seven with no armor or weapons did you really finish the game?