this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
221 points (92.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40760 readers
250 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Voting with your wallet is a lie, like recycling plastic

You can't do collective action individually. You can make the house hurt a little bit, but you'll never force them to change through what you buy. The house always wins, unless you get together to change the rules

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I disagree with this. You can already see a recent example of Canadian consumers avoiding US imports, creating pressure on US companies, and the US government reacting by making moves to curtail the original tarrifs proposal.

Obviously the Canadian boycott was only one component but I believe it did have a meaningful impact.

Kind of agree with you re:plastics. Last time I read about it they could only be recycled once into inferior quality plastic. Ironically in this case I'd suggest voting with your wallet is a solution to the plastic problem since businesses will react to more consumers switching to responsibly packaged products like paper bags for fruit + veg from a local grocers. One of the large supermarket chains in the UK, Waitrose, switched to paper bags due to public pressure in the past few years.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Canadian boycotts are not "voting with your wallet", they're collective action.

Canadians, together, decided to boycott American goods. Their leaders cancelled deals. Their local stores and suppliers decided they'd rather source from anywhere else. The Canadian government started working on trade deals with everyone else

The nation of Canada as a whole is boycotting American goods. They're not doing this individually, they have an organized response

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Encouraging people to vote with their wallet creates collective action. How do you think these things start? You telling people not to bother is exactly how you prevent it.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, that's backwards. You don't reduce plastic by recycling, you don't change corporate behavior by not buying their stuff

If a company loses a customer, that's nothing. If a company has less sales, that's a marketing problem. They aren't going to operate more morally now, because it's a business problem and a PR problem

Boycotts are very different. You get a block of people together, you tell them "we're all boycotting you because X", and then they see it in their numbers. You do it loudly. The investors get nervous, you've very publicly connected the cause and effect, other businesses might join in to take advantage, etc

You have to organize first, it's great to shop ethically if you can, but you're just acting as the market as a whole... Are they going to start farming more sustainably, or are they going to try to convince consumers they are? One of these things is much easier and cheaper

If you're organized, you can come back with "hey everyone, they're bullshitting us, keep up the boycott"

The dangerous part of this is that without organization, people feel like they're fixing the problem when they're not. It gives an illusion of control that isn't there

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Voting with your wallet can be a boycott. Seems like you’re really mincing words here and creating a false equivalent to recycling plastic that no one else is using as a comparison.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a false equivalence, it's the same exact thing

Its a lie. The lie is "you can do collective action individually". You can't... That's not how any of this works

Boycotts are real. Voting with your wallet is just shopping.

There's no message to it, no power - just a slice of consumers to market to differently or a need to pivot

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You can vote with your wallet by not shopping.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 14 hours ago

No, you can't. You can reduce your consumption, and that's great

But you have to eat. You have to wear clothes. You likely have to drive and to pay rent or buy appliances. You have to buy entertainment, because honestly most everything is monitised to crazy levels.

You can't opt out. You can be a different kind of shopper. You can be an anomolus data point. But even if you live in a self built lean to and live as a freegan vegan, you've changed nothing if you've done it alone