this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
231 points (96.0% liked)

World News

46442 readers
2739 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some 125 Indian and Pakistani fighter jets battled for over an hour in one of the biggest dogfights in recent history, according to a Pakistani security source quoted by CNN.

If the numbers of aircraft were confirmed, it would make it one of the largest air battles since World War Two.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 165 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Some 125 Indian and Pakistani fighter jets battled for over an hour in one of the biggest dogfights in recent history, according to a Pakistani security source quoted by CNN.

A total of 125 fighter jets engaged in an hour-long aerial battle, with both sides confined to their own airspace as long-range missiles were exchanged at distances surpassing 100 miles, CNN said.

So no dogfight at all. Thanks, Newsweek.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Dogfight as in two dogs barking each other with a fence in the middle... 😅

[–] FreezerBurnt@lemmy.squids.ca 14 points 9 hours ago

That's the reality of a modern day "dog fight". All radar and ECM...

No one said modern war would be more exciting...

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's modern dogfighting. Don't viate enemy airspace so ground AA can't get you. Rely on BVR missiles because if you are in range with guns something went terribly wrong

[–] tal@lemmy.today 135 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

On the off chance that you're not joking, what @Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works is pointing out:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogfight

A dogfight, or dog fight, is an aerial battle between fighter aircraft that is conducted at close range.

A "dogfight" isn't just a synonym for an air-to-air engagement, but specifically refers to a close-range one.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 14 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Has there been a actual dogfight since Vietnam?

[–] copd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Falklands had several well documented ones. mirages vs harriers with aim9Ls, it didn't end well for the Argentines

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There were some in the first gulf war. People forget but iraq had the sixth largest airforce at the time and were able to shoot down a couple American planes before being overwhelmed and fleeing to Iran.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago

fleeing to Iran

That's ironic, given their war before.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago
[–] kozy138@lemm.ee -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if we consider that some long-range middle engagements are launched from thousand of miles away, surely 100mi can be considered 'close range' by comparison?

How long does it even take a jet to travel 100mi when going Mach 2 or 3?

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

2-3 min at 8,000 m height.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

This is most modern day combat. Getting shot at by things from tens to hundreds of kms. Most people think of WW2 action movies, which are already pretty unrealistic. Or maybe in this case Star Wars dogfights, which are just... lol

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So the air version of their border guard dancy thing where the challenge is who stomps the loudest wins, while random people around enjoy the ridiculous show while eating pop corn.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tbf thats literally exactly what most all warfare was more like prior to WWI

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I think what @Renohren@lemmy.world's referring to is that India and Pakistan have, in the past, conducted nonviolent ceremonies at the border involving soldiers from each side.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LixwXJpggME

I believe that the painting that you're talking about was from an American Civil War battle that was close enough to a city (Washington DC?) that spectators decided to show up to watch. A bunch of people (including, IIRC, spectators) did die. That wasn't being done with the intent of ceremony.

kagis

The First Battle of Bull Run.

https://www.history.com/articles/worst-picnic-in-history-was-interrupted-by-war

On July 21, 1861, Washingtonians trekked to the countryside near Manassas, Virginia, to watch Union and Confederate forces clash in the first major battle of the American Civil War. Known in the North as the First Battle of Bull Run and in the South as the Battle of First Manassas, the military engagement also earned the nickname the “picnic battle” because spectators showed up with sandwiches and opera glasses. These onlookers, who included a number of U.S. congressmen, expected a victory for the Union and a swift end to the war that had begun three months before.

Instead, the battle that day resulted in a bloody defeat for the Union and sent the picnickers scrambling to safety.

Just to confirm, Tineye finds one match corresponding to your image, called "CivalWar_PicnicAtManassas.jpg", so I suspect that's from that battle.

I don't think that I'd call that very representative of even American Civil War battles, though, much less of all prior battles in history.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, instead of shooting missiles they can just try to outdo each other in aerial maneuvers or something.