this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
267 points (96.2% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2573 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

in the example you mention, one thing is antisemitism, the other is not

the fact they are saying it is doesnt make it so

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While true, if people are getting locked up for what you and I agree is not, there is functionally no difference between "is and gets locked up" and "isn't but still gets locked up." See what I mean? Saying is one thing, legal action is another. If one can limit speech, "one" being the ruling class/party, then anything they decide to limit can therefore be legally limited and they can turn it like the above article. If the ruling class is instead limited themselves in their abilty to limit speech, yes nazis can say "jews bad because nonsense," and that sucks, but then you can also say "israel bad because genocide," even if the ruling class does not want you to.

Case in point, has anyone been arrested for this in America yet? Not that I'm aware of. And that isn't a bad thing.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

yes because it is being used as a tool by a totalitarian government, totalitarian governments would do that regardless of how anyone feels about free speech.

does not mean letting nazis and other criminal scum roam around is a good idea in a free country.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, which is bad, and should be called out, which is exactly what I'm doing, which you then come to defend. Face it, the fact that they are a totalitarian (your word) government jailing people for speech is made possible by the fact that they do not have freedom of speech, this is all my exact point.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So whats your point? Governments should not be totalitarian? I mean yeah...

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basically yes. I see people who want it too often.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see plenty of fascists who want it, thats not justification to let them.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Well, yeah, those are some of the people who want a totalitarian state who would seek to limit speech.