this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
486 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No shit.

The fact that is news and not inherently understood just tells you how uninformed people are in order to sell idiots another subscription.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would somebody intuitively know that a newer, presumably improved, model would hallucinate more? Because there’s no fundamental reason a stronger model should have worse hallucination. In that regard, I think the news story is valuable - not everyone uses ChatGPT.

Or are you suggesting that active users should know? I guess that makes more sense.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu -1 points 16 hours ago

There is definitely reason a larger model would have worse hallucinations. Why do you say not? It's a fundamental problem with data scaling in these architectures

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I've never used ChatGPT and really have no interest in it whatsoever.

How about I just do some LSD. Guaranteed my hallucinations will surpass ChatGPT's in spectacular fashion.