this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1184 points (96.7% liked)

World News

46027 readers
3701 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Social media influencers are fuelling a rise in misogyny and sexism in the UK's classrooms, according to teachers.

More than 5,800 teachers were polled... and nearly three in five (59%) said they believe social media use has contributed to a deterioration in pupils' behaviour.

One teacher said she'd had 10-year-old boys "refuse to speak to [her]...because [she is] a woman". Another said "the Andrew Tate phenomena had a huge impact on how [pupils] interacted with females and males they did not see as 'masculine'".

"There is an urgent need for concerted action... to safeguard all children and young people from the dangerous influence of far-right populists and extremists."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yep, that's why the only way to be a good parent nowadays is to not give your kids smart phones or computers of their own. There was a time when it was kinda ok for them to have those devices, but that time is permanently in the past.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Closeted queer kids with bigoted parents need online safe spaces.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mostly disagree with that. Cocooning up into a terminally online person makes one's life worse, not better.

Straight up abusive parents are another thing of course. But even then those kids need sheltering, not the internet.

[–] scintilla@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think you underestimate the sheer number of homophobic parents that aren't necessarily abusive but would be if their kid ever came out. There are a lot of people I've talked to that their online escape was the one thing that kept from killing themselves.

I'm not saying that it's healthy but there are a lot of kids in a situation that they can not escape from because of the way that society treats children. Children are treated as something that is closer to property than an individual when it comes to things like law enforcement and emotional abuse.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Homophobia is abusive. Regardless of the intentions. Ignorance of that fact doesn't excuse it.

[–] scintilla@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I agree. Try arguing that to a conservative judge in the south and you will simply be sent home with your abusive parent, who is likely enraged about having to defend themselves from the "law".

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, absolutely. Having been in a marriage with an abusive person, there is zero reasoning with them once they're in that state.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure there's a way to reason with them; you just didn't know how to go about it.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

See, you say that. I tried to figure that out for 11 years. I lived it. It doesn't happen.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world -3 points 2 days ago

Not everyone is equipped to help people like that.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I think muad'dib is just projecting and maybe you are, too.

Using the internet to avoid dealing with problems in real life is an unhealthy crutch.

[–] scintilla@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

unfortuatly the healthy way to deal with a situation like that is to remove yourself from it which children are not allowed to do.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Using the internet to avoid dealing with problems in real life is an unhealthy crutch.

So is pretending the internet is not part of "real life" like it's 1998.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -1 points 2 days ago

This is a very dangerous line of reasoning that will play right into the hands of fascists.,