this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
157 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13787 readers
738 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

What do you mean? Is there even enough steel on earth to build something that tall? How would such a structure be possible when we can't even keep our ground level structures properly maintained?

[–] hexthismess@hexbear.net 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The current idea is carbon tubes to make the supports light enough, but material science is nowhere near close enough for a space elevator.

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

and this is why we must build the space staircase first before we embark on the mysteries of the elevator

[–] FedPosterman5000@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

Oof I’ve heard of a walk-up but this is ridiculous!

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The key idea of a space elevator is that it's being held in tension by a counterweight just past the point of a geosynchronous orbit. The problem of course being that even being in tension like that we don't have anything that could support its own weight let alone the capacity to construct and place such a massive structure.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

A side note is that earth is probably one of the worst places for a space elevator anyways, the moon isn't an awful choice though.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

supposedly we could do one on the moon to lunar orbit with current materials....

except for the gosh dang UV sensitivity