KobaCumTribute

joined 5 years ago
[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's so weird to include that alongside all the stuff about the bears hunting and eating people. I guess they couldn't find quotes from relatives of the victims if that's being kept private for decency's sake or something, but just this random inclusion of a farmer talking about how heartbroken he is over losing like $50 (at the most) worth of apples is so dissonant with the rest of it.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That bit's actually sort of true albeit phrased in a horrible misleading and overly broad way. Certain pollutants, sulfides mainly IIRC, increase the albedo of the atmosphere and so reduced the impact of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses.

This is, of course, at the cost of causing toxic acid rain and other problems, hence why there's been a concerted effort to reduce or eliminate them wherever possible. I believe they also tend to go along with the kinds of pollution that really fuck up the surrounding area and make it unlivable with smog, too, so there's also an immediate pragmatic reason for eliminating them even when "this has serious widespread negative consequences that directly endangers infrastructure, agriculture, and the environment" isn't enough to convince authorities to take action.

If you're old enough to remember "acid rain" being a big topic in the 90s that kind of fell off the radar, like the "hole in the ozone layer", this is why. The pollutants causing it have been significantly reduced across the world (as have the chemicals responsible for punching a hole in the ozone layer).

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago

It's pretty explicit about it too. They're replicating the systems and violence they were taught, to a backdrop of nuclear war and ongoing fighting between surviving military elements. When they're rescued, after hunting down and murdering one of their own, it's by a hunter/killer sub that's still actively hunting for targets even after the world ended.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

In general yes? There are lots of "when real, this is extremely bad and not fun at all" things that when remade into safely ritualized and/or sufficiently fantastical forms become exciting and safe ways of coping with real anxieties and fears, whether this is through some sort of ritualized roleplay or more explicit fiction and art.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just wanted to elaborate with a footnote without breaking the flow of what I was saying. Checking, the only thing I had saved that might have mentioned it 404ed, although I think that may have just been a resource on doing a blood choke without threatening the wind pipe. This is just general kink community knowledge though, like the risk of nerve/joint damage from poorly placed restraints or how blunt force impacts to the abdomen and particularly around the spine or kidneys are very dangerous.

But like, stopping blood from moving is bad and has a risk of making blood clots (this is why sitting for excessively long periods of time causes a risk of DVT, as blood pools in one's legs more than it should), and cutting off oxygen to the brain is also extremely bad. The only bit that contradicts conventional knowledge is the more recent research that even brief reductions in blood flow to the brain cause brain damage that builds up over time in the same way that minor head impacts add up (another recent discovery, since before the assumption was just that serious concussions were bad but lighter impacts didn't cause injuries).

The article in OP does mention and link studies about the brain damage risk though, I think.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah. Even the "safe" way to do it is one of the most dangerous and "even done completely right, this can still just randomly kill someone^[Due to the risk of blood clots and stroke from stopping the movement of blood through the artery that's entering the brain. It also probably causes minor brain damage every single time, even without a loss in consciousness, and as a result can cause neurological problems if that randomly happens to hit something important.]" kinks someone can engage in and it being mainstreamed into vanilla porn as just like a thing people spontaneously do is bad, but the solution would be like mandating warning labels with sex-positive education on how fucked this is on videos featuring real or simulated choking, not the UK's usual "oh heavens a kink, I must send in the constables and retire to my fainting couch and pray to the depraved sex pest royals for salvation" shit.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago

It has been said that the Republicans are bad cops and the Democrats are good cops.

I prefer it as the Democrats being bad cops, and the Republicans being gibbering eldritch horrors made of graft and howling for blood cops.

The Democrats threaten, the Republicans rampage while stealing everything that's not nailed down.

"Good cops" in that game would be something like socdems, offering a healthcare burger if you fall in line and cooperate with the prison of capitalist society.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It literally, actually means "intentionally killing as many civilians as possible".

It's all targets chosen by some guys in a room pointing at a map and saying "destroy this thing, whatever it is, for reasons", as opposed to being picked out in the field by spotters or aircraft operating on their own discretion.

It's just mostly associated with the WWII and Korean war terror bombing campaigns the British and US carried out where the things being targeted were either residential areas or cities that had industry somewhere in them.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They're an extremely moderate social democracy akin to european ones, and have suffered considerably because of it. The surprising part is that they've managed to keep on the trajectory of having regulated capitalism with some social welfare and nationalized oil without the socdems in charge turning coat and becoming neolibs, without the neolibs managing to coup them despite repeated attempts that have gone completely unpunished, and without any sort of swing to the left as they watch all this moderate capitalism and tolerance for reactionary power blocs only serve to allow reactionaries to keep attacking them from within while still being isolated and attacked by the US for the sin of being a designated subaltern periphery state that dares do regulation and own its own natural resources.

They still deserve support, obviously, and they serve as a very clear example of the racist hypocrisy behind US foreign policy when a state as moderate as Norway gets treated as a pariah simply because they're not white and because they're located within the sphere of influence that the US empire claims as its subjects to be subjugated and looted as it pleases.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So this thing is 100% some vibe coded contractor grift that's either just some repackaged phrenology guesser or that literally just lets its user choose the result he wants, right?

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago

Reminds me of an old cracked article where its author tried to spend however long being "completely logical", except that was a self-effacing shitpost where he went around acting and talking like the space elfs from Star Trek and concluded that the only good thing to come of it was he liked the non-foaming toothpaste he tried.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I usually just watch whatever trackmania video wirtual posted to his low effort slop channel that day. He's neutral and inoffensive enough to be watchable and there's no reason to pay attention to the funny car game, and I don't have to commit to watching the rest of it when I'm done eating because it's completely empty bullshit that's just a sort of neat spectacle to watch when busy with something else. Dude's brain is like 97% trackmania mechanics knowledge, 2% Ancient Egypt trivia, and 1% chess and absolutely nothing else. He's also a completely sexless dork in an apparently stable relationship with a woman who is both clearly smarter than him and also AFAIK older than him, so it's a sort of safe bet he's not doing the streamer crime, and the closest thing to a scandal I've heard about him was an alleged ESL mistake moment from years ago where he confused the English words "racer" and "racist" when trying to play with words.

 

Happened to me three times last night, fucking viscerally terrifying even though I recognized that's what was happening after the first time and could kind of get a handle on the panic the subsequent times.

 

TL;DR: how completely and utterly fucked is it that the lines are getting drawn as the "pro-worker" side being about defending property rights while the pro-AI side is about attacking the value of workers' labor altogether? There's no side left to have the correct take, which is that intellectual property is fake and represents collective theft from society (and at its very best represents a fragile, niche use in sometimes protecting some workers from business), but that AI poses an existential threat to huge numbers of workers and represents the mass enshittification of both media and communication to the benefit of business owners and business owners alone.

Specifically how copyright figures into it: it's like the whole thing is being framed to strengthen copyrights in general in an absurd and dangerous way. It's framing it around ownership rights, which inherently favor those who own the most and have the most power to own the products of others' labor.

It seems like a foregone conclusion to businesses that the products of an AI are infringing on the training material (despite that being nonsensical - the most one could reasonably claim is that the company training the AI violated some terms of use with the training data) and they're just fighting over how cheaply they can establish the rights to use it themselves. Obviously, expanding copyright to such an extent would be catastrophic, especially if they get another DMCA style "anyone can allege a work may have been produced in some way by a machine that may have infringed at some point, and the onus is on the creator to prove it was not rather than the claimant" law out of it.

But if it somehow goes the other way you get the equivalent of liberalized states nationalizing citizens' property so it can then be privatized again and sold to oligarchs and foreign investors for a fraction of its value, the enclosure of all creative workers' labor to the benefit of business and only to business, letting them reap the collective wealth of society and then privatize it for themselves.

No matter how the copyright discourse goes, the corporations win and the workers lose. Copyright is bad, and its repurposing to protect workers is extremely fragile at best. There's no win scenario for the people here: copyright wins, that's bad for workers and good for business; copyright loses, that's bad for workers and good for business.

It ends up being a complete distraction from the real issues with AI generation: how AI generation is a force multiplier on human labor by orders of magnitude, and how disproportionately that benefits business and scammers while massively reducing the opportunities for workers.

Once AI-generation art tools are matured to the level professional image and video editors are it would mean a team of a dozen people could have the same output as a team of hundreds of artists and animators do now, that operations to just shovel out mountains of garbage with a team of a few people could be churning out ten times as much. Just an endless sea of low grade slop competing for your attention, drowning out legitimate works, and using a fraction as much labor as the current endless sea of low grade slop does.

Then there's the even more terrifying prospect of text generation reaching a point where it can feasibly run on hardware that's a few thousand dollars instead of a few tens of thousands of dollars. Astroturfing with classic bots spamming prewritten lines is already horrifyingly effective, even when they fuck up and use the wrong lines and get caught out, as all the CIA bots prove. Astroturfing with entirely fake people goes a step further and is likely to be used not just to push a narrative or advertise a product but simply to drown any platform that's not verifying IDs to drive people into insecure, corporate owned and curated spaces, which will undoubtedly have carve outs to allow government bots and bots representing their owner's interests.

Those are the issues: ever cheapening and devaluing labor and the consequences of this, not questions of ownership and property. Framing it as a question of "who owns this?" and not "whose labor creates this and what is this labor used for?" is surrendering the fight to those who already own the most and ignoring labor entirely.

view more: next ›