this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
495 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stom@lemmy.world 449 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This is why I use Linux, the fingerprint device wouldn't be supported so this wouldn't be an issue /s

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 144 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mmm yes security by non-functionality. A pillar of the modern cybersecurity framework.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But you can use a brick to hack windows.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 6 points 1 year ago

When you could have said crack, but instead said hack.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

But you can use a brick to hack windows

yes indeed, the good ol' broken windows fallacy!

Something something Soviet Russia..

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this is why I am typing this on a 1921 Royal No. 10 typewriter.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Found Tom Hanks's Lemmy account.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago

Works for my webcam. Tbh I'd like someone to hack it, would mean they would've written drivers for it

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

It is called zero trust, killing functionalities is zscaler core business

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fun thing about Linux is your realize physical control is ownership. You can just throw a Bootable Linux image with some utilities and remove the password from a Windows account in a second. If you really need to keep something safe, it has to be encrypted.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one on my Thinkpad works just fine :)

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I got a T80s and the sensor doesn't work. It's an 8th gen Intel machine, that's like four or five generations behind.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got a T440p and I just set it up through the menu in the KDE settings, it worked right out of the box.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mine's not in libfprint, libfprint-tod, or libfprint-goodix. Running GNOME because I heard fprintd was easier to implement instead of KDE, which is usually my pref DE.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah I use fprint on my arch laptop so there is fingerprint login technology. Hopefully that doesn't have security vulnerabilities.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has vulnerabilities for sure. But they haven’t been found because no one cares about hacking you or the 1 other person on earth that use Arch and fingerprint security.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Security by obscurity lol

[–] RFBurns@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Correct answer.

Using any form of biometric 'login' under the US's "justice" system is supremely ill-advised.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

That's funny, on my XPS Windows crashed when I tried adding a fingerprint. Works flawlessly under Arch.

[–] PeWu@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Today I was fucking around with this shit. I can't even update my distro, otherwise ecryptfs will go adios, and fingerprinting will be broken.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of the major reasons I gave up on trying to run Linux on my laptop was lack of fingerprint reader support.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That would be a plus for me, actually. I never liked fingerprint authentication.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

So YES, from someone who was asked to do fingerprint authentication in a sensitive environment (and had to refuse, even to the salespeople pested me)

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can choose not to use it even if Linux supports it.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then I really don't see how it's a plus. Smaller kernel size? lol

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The plus is that I don't even need to think about it.

My phone tries to trick me to enable fingerprint authentication every few months. My laptop? Perfection.

[–] robotica@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How is not having support for something a plus for you? I swear to god, some Linux users are so stuck up.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Where to start....

My dumb TV doesn't support smart features. A plus.

My coffee maker doesn't support wifi. A plus.

My games don't support in-app purchases. A plus.

My windows 10 laptop (did you read that?! Whaaat, I'm not a Linux user???!!!) doesn't support Windows 11. Major plus.

My MacBook's OS version (no way!!!) doesn't support unnecessary FaceTime features. A plus.

[–] smort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What TV did you get that doesn’t have smart features?

I looked, but all the ones I could find were 1080p, no HDR, and either tiny or made for commercial/industrial installation.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I got a Sceptre one a few years ago. Okay quality, terrible speakers (though an external soundbar takes care of that.)

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago

"what, you dont want to use the new door lock made from soggy white bread? You deadbolt losers are so stuck up"

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fingerprint login is not secure. period. Being stuck in using a password login is a plus

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could just disable fingerprint login, though.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, but that's not the point of the conversation. The point is that some stranger is judging a whole community for the preference of one single person who may or may not belong to said community.

wouldn't be supported so this wouldn't be an issue

I did not expect that 😅

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I have a Microsoft fingerprint reader that works fine on Linux lol