Who will the Supreme Court side with? 
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
126 points (99.2% liked)
chapotraphouse
13758 readers
914 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There really is no way without blatantly disregarding the constitution. It would lead to the collapse of the United States.
Surely there must be some downsides, though.
Yeah, it's gonna fucking turbocharge the fascism that is already inbuilt
The US has blatantly disregarded the constitution loads of times. To pretend that breaking it now would necessarily lead to collapse is a bit weird.
I think there's a difference between ending democracy and whatever you're referring to.
Letting someone run for additional terms isn't exactly ending democracy. If anything, stopping people from voting for their preferred candidate because they've already been president is less democratic than allowing additional terms.
There is. The Constitution isn't clear on how the 22nd (anyone who has served two terms is ineligible to be elected president) and the 12th (anyone ineligible to be president is ineligible to be Vice President) interact. Notice the difference in wording, the 22nd is specifically about being elected president, not being president.
So theoretically he could be elected as VP and have his running mate resign to give him the presidency again. The only thing that would really stop that is a Supreme Court ruling, but the Supreme Court is mostly Trump appointees.
Or of course he could take a page from his buddy Bukele and have the Supreme Court say "nah you're good to be elected again" despite the Constitution clearly saying otherwise.
I don't even think the resign part is necessary for the right to continue business as usual.
Oh please. Iowa isnt going to secede because of that.