this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
94 points (97.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

16948 readers
313 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 72 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This totally invalidates their argument "Linux isn't big enough to care about". I highly doubt there are more Windows Arm gamers than Linux gamers.

[–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They won’t or can’t get their anti-cheat/DRM in as a kernel module. Would you trust that bunch of fucks to not screw something up terribly by trying to pop in something like that?

[–] chrischryse@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So what’s so bad if it’s kernel level?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

It is a potential security risk to the system and enables extremely intrusive control and surveillance.

It’s basically a rootkit.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 hours ago

They can't even effectively prevent cheaters so I'm always suspicious what the real intent of these rootkits.

[–] chrischryse@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yikes. I did not know that. I’m a Linux user but when it comes to talking about kernel stuff I’m like “what?”

[–] humandotexe@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 hours ago

Tldr kernel access is bad.

You have a great personal reference point for this; you use Linux, and when have you ever needed kernel access regularly?

What conceivable reason could a game dev have for wanting access to that?

How could having that access be detrimental to your machines security?

[–] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It means they expect Windows on ARM to get bigger.

[–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

If that's the case they should not say stuff like "oh we would totally support Linux if the Steam Deck would have sold 10 million copies, the userbase is just too small now" but then proceed to support ARM which has a much smaller userbase still while there's not even a guarantee it will outgrow Linux in the near future. Just quit the BS and say you'll never want to support Linux.

[–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I really haven’t been paying attention on the consumer side, are there a ton of systems in the works or out for ARM on windows? Everything I see due to my line of work is business class SKU’s they are not cheap and not game friendly. 😬

[–] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There are plenty of Windows on ARM laptiops available from major manufacturers, including Microsoft, Samsung, Acer, Asus, Dell, etc. Microsoft notably sells their ARM laptops for less than the Intel version; not sure about the other brands.

The iGPUs obviously don't compare to dedicated GPUs, even those that are a few generations old, but it has enough power for gaming in lighter games and even heavier games if you're willing to turn the graphics to low and lower the resolution.

Last I saw, there were a lot of game incompatibility issues, but I haven't been paying attention since launch. But this thread is literally about Epic improving their support on ARM, albeit with a "they hate Linux!" spin on it.

[–] Amaterasu@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

Are we even able to successfully add an eGPU on those ARM laptops using a Linux distro?