this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
649 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

66353 readers
4367 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Troubled robot vacuum-cleaner maker iRobot, abandoned by Amazon after regulators effectively doomed the web giant's takeover offer, has warned investors it may not survive the next 12 months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 176 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Hmm so this entire trick of setting up companies just to be bought by mega corps appears to be not a viable strategy if anti trust law is enforced?

Edit: apparently this company was set up before sell to mega corp craze got kicked off. I don't think changes the thesis but this case study doesn't support it with the strength I suggested

Hmm as if last 30 years of corpo behavior has been essentially to maintain mega corp dominance via captured regulators and legislators

We got the capitalism alright but where is the free market at, daddy?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

setting up companies just to be bought by mega corps

iRobot was originally founded all the way back in 1990 and have sold quite a lot of Roomba vacuums, advancing innovation in home automation along the way. I don’t think anyone can ever say that they set up this company for a quick flip corpo pump and dump.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was originally at up to leech government funding for “weapons research”. I guess I’m old because nobody here seems to remember that.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

iRobot started off as a defense contractor making mine clearing algorithms or some such vaporware.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago

Hmm an interesting pivot

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well damn.. How did they run the company into the ground?

Let me guess cheap Chinese robots sold on amazon?

Thank you providing additional context.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly I think they suffer a little from early-mover disadvantage.

“Cheap Chinese” and all the associations that come with that is a little reductive in this case. Roborock vacuums are not actually cheap - they are extraordinarily well-made, featureful, and a good value compared to iRobot.

Decades ago, iRobot probably spent millions in R&D just to arrive at navigation algorithms that were worse than what you can get with open-source libraries today. They also spent the marketing dollars to convince people these robots were safe and effective. They weren’t always, so there were some ups and downs in that.

Nowadays the supporting technologies are all much more advanced (and cheaper) and the market for these robots has been created already and is very robust. Companies like Roborock just have to come in and build a good product and they’ll see much faster returns than iRobot did for all those years. They can go straight to lidar, which was probably prohibitive for iRobot for many years, leading iRobot to invest heavily in other technologies which are now a generation behind.

So in addition to their decades of tech legacy. iRobot is burdened with the expectations of longtime investors who want a big cashout, just as they are getting eaten alive by all this new competition. They pinned their hopes on a big exit and are now holding the bag. It’s not surprising that this all left them in trouble.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't worry, the new strategy is to string a company along with talks of a buyout, then when their cash runs out and they declare bankruptcy, to buy all the assets on fire sale.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 25 points 1 day ago

Owners of the take over target shoulda worked harder and maybe ate less avocado toast?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

fire tablet, fire phone, fire sale!

[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The market is “free” to fuck you and everyone you know on the ass.

Didn’t you know that’s what “free market“ means?

[–] Bellingdog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do, in fact, dislike being fucked on the ass.

[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like it, myself, but not when it’s a major global multi billion dollar corporation doing it.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The operative word here is consent haha

[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is always the operative word. Except for those who don’t can’t and will never accept that that word exists.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Parasite class and their legal persons sure do have a rapist culture as their MO

[–] upandup@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

It’s not capitalism without exploitation.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

oh its free alright. for oligarchs to do whatever the fuck they want.

You just gotta be big enough that you can buy enough people. FAANG is there (though this is Wild West politics nowadays so who the fuck knows what’s gonna happen). But when you own the people writing the laws to control you… they’re not controlling you.