this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
199 points (98.1% liked)

ich_iel

2525 readers
1034 users here now

Die offizielle Zweigstelle von ich_iel im Fediversum.

Alle Pfosten müssen den Titel 'ich_iel' haben, der Unterstrich darf durch ein beliebiges Symbol oder Bildschriftzeichen ersetzt werden. Ihr dürft euch frei entfalten!


Matrix


📱 Empfohlene Schlaufon-Applikationen für Lassmich


Befreundete Kommunen:

!wir_iel@feddit.org

!i_itrl@feddit.org

!ich_ial@lemmy.world

!zunftgemeinde@feddit.org


Sonstiges:

Zangendeutsch-Wörterbuch


Regeln:

1. Seid nett zueinander

Diskriminierung anderer Benutzer, Beleidigungen und Provokationen sind verboten.

2. Pfosten müssen den Titel 'ich_iel' oder 'ich iel' haben

Nur Pfosten mit dem Titel 'ich_iel' oder 'ich iel' sind zugelassen. Alle anderen werden automatisch entfernt.

Unterstrich oder Abstand dürfen durch ein beliebiges Textsymbol oder bis zu drei beliebige Emojis ersetzt werden.

3. Keine Hochwähl-Maimais oder (Eigen)werbung

Alle Pfosten, die um Hochwählis bitten oder Werbung beinhalten werden entfernt. Hiermit ist auch Eigenwerbung gemeint, z.b. für andere Gemeinschaften.

4. Keine Bildschirmschüsse von Unterhaltungen

Alle Pfosten, die Bildschirmschüsse von Unterhaltungen, wie beispielsweise aus WasistApplikaton oder Zwietracht zeigen, sind nicht erlaubt. Hierzu zählen auch Unterhaltungen mit KIs.

5. Keine kantigen Beiträge oder Meta-Beiträge

ich_iel ist kein kantiges Maimai-Brett. Meta-Beiträge, insbesondere über gelöschte oder gesperrte Beiträge, sind nicht erlaubt.

6. Keine Überfälle

Wer einen Überfall auf eine andere Gemeinschaft plant, muss diesen zuerst mit den Mods abklären. Brigadieren ist strengstens verboten.

7. Keine Ü40-Maimais

Maimais, die es bereits in die WasistApplikation-Familienplauderei geschafft haben oder von Rüdiger beim letzten Stammtisch herumgezeigt wurden, sind besser auf /c/ichbin40undlustig aufgehoben.

8. ich_iel ist eine humoristische Plattform

Alle Pfosten auf ich_iel müssen humorvoll gestaltet sein. Humor ist subjektiv, aber ein Pfosten muss zumindest einen humoristischen Anspruch haben. Die Atmosphäre auf ich_iel soll humorvoll und locker gehalten werden.

9. Keine Polemik, keine Köderbeiträge, keine Falschmeldungen

Beiträge, die wegen Polemik negativ auffallen, sind nicht gestattet. Desweiteren sind Pfosten nicht gestattet, die primär Empörung, Aufregung, Wut o.Ä. über ein (insbesonders, aber nicht nur) politisches Thema hervorrufen sollen. Die Verbreitung von Falschmeldungen ist bei uns nicht erlaubt.


Bitte beachtet auch die Regeln von Feddit.org

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Bullshit. They want Putin to piss off out of Ukraine. According to Die Linke, peace can only be reached when every last russian soldier retreats and the occupied territories are returned to Ukraine. Also, they want further and stricter sanctions against Putin, his puppets and the russian military industrial complex.

Doesn't sounds like they are close to Putin or want to give him anything.

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

this only means they're delusional.

"when we stop to support the Ukraine with weapons, we're sure nothing bad will happen and Putin will leave voluntarily if we just nicely ask him to"

seriously, how disconnected from reality can one be?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That is an argument to be made. But it's far away fromnthe party being friendly towards Putin's Russia.

Also, it's not voluntarily. The Party wants to further the sanctions against Putin, his puppets and the russian military industrial complex and also want to put more international pressure on Russia.

Again, we can debate how effective those measures would be, and given the recent news about how the sanctions against russia are circumvented I'd be unsure and personally I am supportive of arms deliveries for Ukraine, but accusations of being Putin's friends are just false. If you want to see Putin's puppets in the german parliament, look at AfD and BSW. You will see the differences, I think.

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

accusations of being Putin's friends are just false

that might be, but it doesn't matter for me. AfD and BSW want to stop weapon deliveries just like Die Linke.

AfD and BSW are Putins friends and what they demand leads to Putin getting (parts of) Ukraine. Die Linke isn't Putins friend and what they demand leads to Putin getting (parts of) Ukraine. in the end it's the same

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Die Linke isn't Putins friend and what they demand leads to Putin getting (parts of) Ukraine. in the end it's the same

No, that's wrong. Die Linked demands the full retreat of Russia, international security guarantees and full ukrainian sovereignty.

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Die Linke can demand from Putin whatever the hell they want. without weapons Ukraine is doomed and there's no reason for Putin to listen to their demands and to think he'll listen is, like I said, delusional (that's my whole point).

also, Putins promises and guarantees (which he won't make) mean nothing. what's stopping him from attacking again after rebuilding his army?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But Die Linke doesn't (only) demands from Putin but wants to bring international pressure and international security guarantees.

Again, I agree that Ukraine also needs weapons, but that's not the point I'm arguing. I argue that saying "Die Linke is friendly towards Russia" is a false statement and that their points are not misrepresented.

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Die Linke is friendly towards Russia" is a false statement

okay yeah, I agree with you on that. my point is that Die Linke is delusional in thinking Putin won't win if Ukraine can't defend itself

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

That we do agree on.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I think what Putin wants more than anything is for countries to stop arms deliveries to Ukraine. And what I see is that the Linke want that too.

So, they are aligned at this.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You just can keep construction your BS, that doesn't change that Die Linked opposes Putin and other autocrats. I see no point in furthering this discussion since I don't like running headfirst into brick walls. Bye.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The real reason is you can't argue what im saying.

Look, I don't think the Linke is actually on Putins side. I'm saying they are stupid and doing Putin a favour even if they don't want to. It's the same with the Left in my country.

Also: tankies exist. And often they will exist in the most left party. So it's not completely out there to expect there might be some genuine affection for Putin there. There is in my country.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Also: tankies exist. And often they will exist in the most left party. So it's not completely out there to expect there might be some genuine affection for Putin there.

But the tankies just left and created their own party, the BSW.

Also I find it stupid to compare two parries from different countries to say they're the same because they lean in the same general direction.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm not saying they are the same, but they are both strongly on the left, I checked and they have the same policies, very sensible policies in my opinion. And they both oppose weapon support for Ukraine.

I did a google search and without any problem found groups associating with Die Linke that are tankies. Marx21, Kommunistische platform.

So yeah pretty similar. Both very problematic in the sense of their connection to Russia and Putin.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

Dude, let's just end it here. I have no idea where you're from and what party from.your country you're talking about. Neither of us has enough knowledge about each other's party to really talk this out, especially not about the actual processes inside the parties. A quick google search will not give sufficient insights and you refuse to acknowledge viewpoints and insists that do not conform to your superficial judgment, which is really pissing me off. Bye.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They want to stop arms delivering in itself. But if that means Ukraine will fall they won't stop it now.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They won't stop it? What does that mean? Would they increase it if USA stops for instance?

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Are you asking me what "not stopping" means?

I don't know about an increase.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm asking are they on board with supplying weapons. Do they understand that there is no other way. Or are they so reluctant that they will change their mind when an opportunity for that occurs?