this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
202 points (93.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43968 readers
694 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, if you insist on buying Advil instead of store brand ibuprofen. I mean, youโ€™d be wasting your money in that example, but you do you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] adam_b@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

moving production elsewhere will change nothing

Probably yes, but isn't relying on a single country to get your chips, equal or even more problematic. especially when you know that that country is heavily invested in cyberwarfare, espionage and censorship.

Even their constitution states that every Chinese product ( software or hardware ), must send data it collects to the government.

What's stops them from "chipping" every phone they export ? Or hardcoding spyware into the motherboard or CPU ? Nothing ( this is way more scarier than software level spying )

What do you think the CCP is gonna do to you? You're outside of their jurisdiction completely.

You don't know that ๐Ÿ’€

it js just propaganda, in a sense that it's trying to make you think this kind of behavior is somehow unique to Chinese companies or a result of tech being manufactured in China

This is like Apple saying your Android spies on you... lol ( I believe they did say that )

I'm aware of US privacy laws ( e.g. Cloud Act ) and technologies ( e.g. Intel ME ), yeah it's not unique to China

[โ€“] Saizaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

especially when you know that that country is heavily invested in cyberwarfare, espionage and censorship.

Which country isn't? The US does more spying on its own citizens than China could ever dream of doing. The UK is currently trying to pass a bill to break e2ee.

Even their constitution states that every Chinese product ( software or hardware ), must send data it collects to the government.

This is false as far as I know, can you provide a source? China has some of the strictest laws on data protection, you can read more about it here: https://academic.oup.com/idpl/article/12/2/75/6537091?login=false

This is like Apple saying your Android spies on you... lol ( I believe they did say that )

Not sure where you were going with this. My point is you don't hear any of these concerns raised about any other and as we both agree it's not something unique to China.

The real reason why you hear a lot of talk about moving production out of China lately is simply because Chinese manufacurers have narrowed the the gap a lot in terms of chip designs and are becoming an actual threat to western comanies' profit margins.

[โ€“] adam_b@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

China has some of the strictest laws on data protection

Is that so ? , protection from who ?

just so we on the same page, I'm talking about data is gathered, not whether it's protected ( legally ) , idc

can you provide a source?

I'm not a lawyer but I think somewhere in the DSL it mentions data is collected from companies within China and outside, but why is it hard for you to swallow, knowing that US based companies ( with all the power they have, lawyers.. Etc ) comply with data collection laws

Not sure where you were going with this

It's more of a metaphor I guess, basically it's a decoy, they tell you these people are spying on you, while they do the same or worse

becoming an actual threat to western companies' profit margins.

Aaside from that, US officials make good points when they talk about the threat of Chinese products ( Tiktok, Huawei ) from a Cybersecurity perspective

[โ€“] Saizaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linking to the great firewall article is completely nonsensical in this context, and you would be aware of that if you had bothered to open the link in my previous comment.

just so we on the same page, I'm talking about data is gathered, not whether it's protected ( legally ) , idc

Which is exactly what I'm talking about, which you would again know if you read what I linked.

I'm not a lawyer but I think somewhere in the DSL it mentions data is collected from companies within China and outside

It doesn't, what I linked to discusses the very laws you are talking about at length if you are actually interested rather than just spouting nonsense like "it's in the constitution".

Just so we're on the same page you have no idea about Chinese laws on gathering, processing and handling of data, but you heard it somewhere, repeat it, won't bother to research further and then claim there's no propaganda.

but why is it hard for you to swallow, knowing that US based companies ( with all the power they have, lawyers.. Etc ) comply with data collection laws

Because they don't. Evidenced by all the fines the EU is handing out to google, meta, etc. You could also look to all the stuff Snowden blew the whostle on. Do you think they just stopped doing mass surveillance on a global level?

[โ€“] adam_b@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, shoot didn't realize China is a privacy haven, maybe I should move there, maybe I should install Tiktok as well, is that what you're saying ?

Because they don't. Evidenced by all the fines the EU is handing out to google, meta, etc. You could also look to all the stuff Snowden blew the whostle on. Do you think they just stopped doing mass surveillance on a global level?

There is a misunderstanding here, I meant they do comply with FBI subpoena's and they do handle data to US government and 3 letter agencies, why is it that you think Chinese companies are safe from their government ? ( I'll rephrase it : if US gov can just order US based companies to hand over user messages and emails, why can't China gov do the same to Chinese based companies ? considering their track record )

I did open your article BTW, it doesn't answer this question, off course i didn't read the whole thing

then claim there's no propaganda

how ? When ?

Didn't say it's not propaganda, I was the first to suspect the news I shared to be propaganda, but that doesn't mean there is no truth in it, that's how you make successful propaganda, you add false narratives to the real ones, have you listened to why your government officials wanted to ban Tiktok ?