this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
197 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13669 readers
863 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Had a similar spat of annoying interactions on my effort post about pitbulls and racism "Wow you comparing black people to animals how racist" no mother fuckers I was pointing out with exhaustive sources about how shit like pitbull hysteria and breed specific legislation have been proven to enable new forms of redlining and are born from the same sort of bioessentialism used to justify a number of other forms of bigotry.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 15 hours ago

I've posted this before on fedi, but "aggressive dogs" get divided up into two categories:

  • That dog is spicy so I will stay away (eg. German Shepherds, various livestock guardian dogs)
  • That dog is spicy so you should get rid of it (eg. bully breeds, rottweilers)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really, really hate when you try to compare a bad thing to racism and someone says "oh so you're comparing [bad thing] to racism?" Yes! Yes I am! Because two bad things don't need to be exactly equal in magnitude to still be comparable.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

It's not even just comparable it is literally part of the superstructure of white supremacy. For example a dog is more likely to be identified as a pitbull if the owner isn't white. It also is used to sneak in scientific racism via the argument that they are genetically predisposed to aggression and violence.