this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
360 points (96.9% liked)

Science

3384 readers
867 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Fusion would provide orders of magnitude more power than solar. There's a limit on how much we can practically get from solar, fusion would allow us to exceed that.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

There’s a limit on how much we can practically get from solar,

Most residential buildings can self sustain from solar. Dense cities not, but there is dual use grazing and agriculture land, and small portions of desert that could power the world. Solar is enough for type 1 civilization. Nuclear plant energy density is overstated due to their + uranium mine exclusion zones, which could produce more solar power than the uranium content available in those mines.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but there's no prizes for producing way more power than we use. We're not running out of space to put solar panels or batteries.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago

'Too much power' has never been an issue, and will likely not be an issue ever with solar. There are multitudes of technologies, especially in industry, that are currently impractical because they would consume too much energy.

[–] Farvana@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

In three decades, having a power source that can be placed away from the elements is going to be a very good thing.