this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
333 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39691 readers
2806 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 55 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Hehe. As planned. Thanks to people who refused to vote for Kamala. Leopards don’t see political parties, all faces taste the same.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What’s changed is all hope for cancelling weapons to Israel is gone. Kamala, while certainly not a great option, could at least be pressured.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

You were foolish to have hope in the first place because if tens of thousands of innocent children getting blown into little pieces wasn't enough to stop weapon sales, nothing is. Thinking that Harris "could be pressured" is just magical thinking because she, nor Biden, had any intention of stopping their aid to Israel to the point that they were willing to hand over control to the Republicans rather than even saying anything negative about Israel's conduct and their participation in it.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Well, you’re not wrong. But Trump will make things over there (and locally) significantly worse in the long run. Yes, worse than it is now. All the while talking about progress, and how much better things are.

In the end, all the land will be handed over to Israel, and developers will turn it into a resort town. Anyone left alive will be a servant to the wealthy.

And my hope was “could be pressured” as opposed to “no chance in hell.” We cut our nose of to spite our face.

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Are you simply a troll? If everything is hopeless than why do you pretend to care?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say "everything is hopeless" I said that Biden, Harris, and Trump were never going to do anything but aid in this genocide.

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

"You were foolish to have hope in the first place"

This is the trolley problem. Harris was the path of less suffering, simple as that.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

A slightly bigger bomb won't change anything materially on the ground in Gaza. The only significant change recently has been a cease fire. Whether it will hold or not is as yet unknown. But at least so far, Trump has somehow actually managed to be better on Gaza than Biden. Trump has shown a willingness to actually use the carrots and sticks of US foreign policy to produce outcomes. Biden offered unconditional support to Israel, while Trump seems to have forced them to come to the peace table by threatening to withhold support. In other words, Trump did what Biden's base had been begging him to do for a year.

It's possible all this falls apart. And it is possible that Trump will prove far worse, for example by allowing an annexation of the West Bank. But so far at least, Trump has actually been a lot better for the Palestinians than Biden. Biden and Harris fundamentally do not accept that Israel should ever be held accountable for anything.

I don't think Trump did the cease fire out of moral concerns; I'm sure it was purely self-serving on his part. But he was actually willing to use the US's various carrots and sticks to force through a cease fire agreement. That is something Biden never had the balls to do.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Trump didn’t do anything. He has no control over Israel. He did nothing for this cease fire. I’m sure he would love to take credit one day and not the next.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

[CITATION NEEDED]

He's had people involved in backroom negotiations for months. Yes, it is a dirty tactic. This has a lot of undertones of Reagan's deal with the Iranians. He didn't have great intentions in negotiating a ceasefire, but he did manage to do it. And Trump has shown a willingness in the past to hold US military aid as a stick to change the behavior of allies. It's reasonable to think he did the same thing here.

The US DOES have substantial control over Israel. Reagan for instance dramatically affected Israel's behavior by withholding weapons. Biden was more permissive of Israel than Reagan was.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 8 hours ago

That is certainly possible, but any involvement from him would have been because he wanted to gain personal wealth or power. I’m sure you know this, but people need to remember that anything that Trump is doing to hold Israel in check has nothing to do with helping Gaza or the Palestinians. He doesn’t care. I do think that he’s very interested in developing on that land. If you recall, a while back there was something going around about Jared Kushner being involved with development in Gaza. I’m not sure what came of that and I don’t remember the exact details.

[–] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

He sold the West Bank for 100m to Adelson. The genocide won’t stop their focus is just shifting temporarily. It’s not a win, Biden could’ve got them to agree on those terms too. Just like he could’ve ended the Ukraine war if he just told Ukraine to give up and concede a chunk of land.