Politics

10211 readers

252 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Dems Privately Discussed Biden Being Unfit to Run, Paving Way for Trump: Report (www.rollingstone.com)

submitted 3 days ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As @spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org predicted not too many hours ago, it has begun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree, Dems have not worked on generational change. Strangely when they put forward a candidate that is a younger generation, they loose to an old oligarch which favors neither the working class or the generational change.

Ironically, the GOP is not and never has been a working class party but a lot of working class people have moved there. What they have been able to do is talk to the working class and have much more folksie candidates. Plus large parts of the US is not ready for anything but a white male president.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What they have been able to do is talk to the working class and have much more folksie candidates.

Because they have populist candidates. Obama winning was such a political upset in the GOP that it largely silenced the Republicans who had been suppressing their populist, right-wing flank (the Tea Party, at that time), and once that dam broke they very quickly had tons and tons of young, populist, "folksie" candidates get in office.

The DNC on the other hand has moved to quash their populist flank even harder, and tried to reassert their top-down control of the party. Obama wasn't the DNC-favored candidate in the 2008 primaries -that was Hilary- and they were eager to ensure that kind of upset never happened again. The easiest way to do that is just to prevent any new blood from getting in.