this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
146 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5387 readers
380 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
146
Shell greenwashed gas using "phantom" carbon credits | Shell used rice-farming offsets for “carbon neutral” LNG campaign – but farmers and local authorities said no project activities took place (www.climatechangenews.com)
submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Carbon offsets are bullshit.

Relevant John Oliver.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 3 days ago

As is recycling and most other greenwashed bandages they drape over the biggest impending disaster in history.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some are, some aren’t. The scientific community recognizes offsets in the form of financing the construction or maintenance of alternative energy systems. You can run a legitimately carbon neutral business with this model.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago

The problem is that something like 90% of the offsets are fake like this, and of the remaining ones, another 90% have a mismatch between how long gases emitted raise atmospheric concentrations and how long the offset lowers them for.