this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
622 points (97.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

30037 readers
438 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
622
If I have to fact-check the uncited claims made in news articles, doesn't that make me the journalist? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
224 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

[…] The last few years have been basically “get it written, get it out the door and fact check later if time allows”. […]

If true, that's terrible, imo. Anecdotally, it would explain a great deal.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yes it would. As would the almost certain fact that you personally choose not to actually pay for journalism, despite criticizing it liberally.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

While I don't think the lack of quality journalism is all due to OP not paying for it (I have no clue if they do or don't) but there is a lot of complaining on Lemmy and Reddit about paywalls which is annoying. The idea that people want quality journalism but get pissed off when those journalist and news organizations asked to get paid for it is ridiculous.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The hypocrisy and entitlement is infuriating.

The internet has destroyed journalism's business model. A respected profession has been pauperized. Salaries in freefall, hardly any job security left.

And people who pay nothing (let's be real, OP is paying nothing) add insult to injury by demanding a higher quality product.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And when we do pay for it (magazines, physical newspapers) it's over half ads.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

[…] The last few years have been basically “get it written, get it out the door and fact check later if time allows”. […]

[…] Anecdotally, it would explain a great deal.

[…] it […] would [also explain] the almost certain fact that you personally choose not to actually pay for journalism

I'm not sure I follow your logic. Could you clarify what you mean?

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

[…] the almost certain fact that you personally choose not to actually pay for journalism, despite criticizing it liberally.

Are you saying that one's criticism of journalism is only valid if they pay for it?

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

[…] the almost certain fact that you personally choose not to actually pay for journalism […]

What makes you so sure that I would be opposed to paying for journalism?