this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
502 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5387 readers
470 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Electric cars are not THE solution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 28 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Does anyone know of another efficient mode of transportation that has near-zero surface friction?

Because that would be a gamechanger

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago

There are some vehicles that go on iron wheels, on a special kind of iron road that are very efficient. Only bad parts are costly initial investment and difficulties to scale up if the existing network gets overloaded (such as the Swedish rail system who has been over "maximum" capacity for a long time which has put needed maintenance on hold at many places)

[–] moonbunny@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe there’s some kind of a wheel, like a metal wheel that could just glide across narrow metal surfaces that could follow a set path….

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

imagine if it had a flange, so around turns the wheels could hook into the the metal surfaces so they wouldn't go off them, that would sure be neat

[–] FrederikNJS@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually the flanges are only an additional safe guard. The train wheels are actually a bit cone shaped which makes then self-centering on their own, even without the flange: https://youtu.be/Nteyw40i9So

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

'Train'? What is this 'Train' you speak of?

[–] FrederikNJS@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh! You must be from the land of the free! I'm sorry...

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hovercrafts have been around for ages. I'm not sure that the random driver would love using one though.

[–] sinkingship@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I somehow doubt they would have less particles from friction. They usually use a cushion which touches the ground.

The imagination of a busy intersection with common people driving hovercrafts is funny, though. Or imagine driving on slopes.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

Well the was this idea of propelling trains through a vacuum tube system.

Unfortunately it's being developed by a shithead and misappropriated by the car industry to hamper railway development in the us

[–] ___@lemm.ee -4 points 1 week ago

Hyperloop theoretically, practically who knows.