this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
376 points (90.3% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2401 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Netanyahu does not state that killing of civilians is his goal, nor does IDF purposely do that. Imagine the amount of civilian deaths if it were actually IDF’s goal, as it is for Hamas.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your argument might have more weight if the head of national security wasn't a former member of the Kach party, a group Israel designated a terrorist group in 1994.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they kill plenty anyway.

Oops?

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right human shields don't exist

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They bombed a refugee camp. Twice.

If I were a military commander in WW2 with the same technology we have today, and Hitler was out in the open at an elementary school graduation next to a preschool, I would not make that order. Instead, I'd mobilize intelligence agents to get there immediately and tail him, while moving my forces nearby.

I find it hard to believe that Israeli military and intelligence agencies could not track him and wait. The IDF just cares more about their own skin than they do of Palestinian children.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago

It took the US 10 years to track down Bin Laden, all the while he was still communicating with cells. In your example that is a LOT of quality holocaust time for Hitler.

There is no easy way out of the trolley problem of slippery genocidal targets popping up with a limited time window to execute.

Both can exist. Don't get binary.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is an important distinction in my opinion. Does the IDF care if they kill palestinian civilians? No. But they aren't actively trying to murder as many palestinian civilians as they can either.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Being so incredibly nonchalant about killing civilians as the IDF is it's almost an insignificant difference imo.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They aren't? So why did they bomb Jabalia twice?

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Quick update, they bombed it a third time today

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How should I know. What I do know however is that if the IDF wanted, they could kill many more Gazans.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Seriously look at their actions and decide for yourself whether or not they are going out of their way to kill civilians or whether they are so careless they kill anyone on their way

The idea that the IDF would have to beat Gaza into a pulp so we can finally admit to ourselves that they don't care about civilians is weak, not to mention a logical fallacy. This isn't the indication to look for when war crimes happen. It's the actions of the IDF themselves.

Just look at all the times Israel told civilians to move to one place them bombed the shit out of the place.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe they just want plausible deniability more than they want immediate genocide. It sure looks to me like that's what they're doing, and that it's working.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Hamas has used it as a base for decades…

Just like every other piece of civilian infrastructure.

You say Jabalia like it hasn’t been a city since the 40s. It’s not some tent city. It’s a legitimate city that has been around for decades, which Hamas only took control of after 2007.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes totally, that is enough excuse to shoot dead over a hundred people and wound hundreds more.

Tents or not, you're basically saying Israel bombed a crowded area and I'm afraid they are losing this one in the media. 😊

It's a refugee camp because people who live there are more victims of Israeli displacement.