Technology

59555 readers

3874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

611

DOJ to ask judge to force Google to sell off Chrome, Bloomberg reports (neuters.de)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Except you’re not dealing with anything. What do you think happens once Google sells Chrome? They release a new browser a month later, and it will be better than Chrome because nobody has the manpower to develop a web browser at the same speed as Google. This is a waste of time.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd assume the ruling would also stipulate that they don't develop a new browser for X years. Otherwise they could be right back in a day by forking Chromium.

[–] tekato@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you’re saying a company should be prohibited from developing a product because it might be better than the competition? I don’t think you guys even realize what you’re advocating for.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I do. The exact reason this legal framework is in place

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Can’t argue with that. Have a nice day.