this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
1341 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 122 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Good meme, but we really ought to end small-penis hatred.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 144 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

It's not the small penis we hate, it's the loud car.

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My most satisfying sexual experience was with a small dude

I begged him for a second date. I think he was self-conscious about it. Dude was marriage material

[–] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

I m a small dude thx to give me confidence

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, but we use the small penis as an insult, which is not fair.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't understand nudity options in games. You got average and above average. Few people gonna go with average then.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Those are noobs though, just git good and save the world with a small dick.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Is it fair if I'm a sissy?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hate a lot of things.
Guess i should start body shaming because of that?

No. Only insecure losers bodyshame.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's like with the "do you punch a Nazi?", even pacifists have limits.

Then again, I think for me it's ok to hit people where it hurts when you want to hurt them--- and penis size is the "alpha males" easy and effective target just like crowd size is a certain assholes weakness.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not even remotely comparable. When you punch a Nazi you are only hurting a Nazi.
When you body shame you hurt every single person who has that characteristic.

If everyone started shitting on characteristics you possess you probably wouldn't like it either.
Have some fucking empathy.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Drag doesn't know a single person who buys into that penis size stuff and isn't a conservative. In fact, most of drag's friends have a penis and want to get rid of it.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Ok, except what if only the target is within earshot and it's used exclusively to make that person feel like shit? And would this be true of any other insult that could potentially apply to someone else, like being bad at something? Although I guess if harm is the goal, empathy isn't exactly a priority.

I'll concede you're right about collateral damage, though. Friends of mine know I don't actually believe the insult in most cases (especially penis size, what am I, 12?), but I use more tact if I'm worried it would upset present company or being up bad memories, etc (more commonly fat shaming). I also don't insult people like I used to, though.

But, I don't really hold anything sacred and I'm not about to hold back a good insult for a hypothetical person.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Problem is that this legitimizes their belief that there are set characteristics that define people as “manly.”

Every 30 years or so we make some sort of social progress for women and/or LGBT people, and then a panic ensues that society is trying to destroy manliness. The Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates of the world suddenly pop up and start selling their nonsense that will magically make them the man’s men that their grandfathers were (while in fact their grandfathers were being told the same thing.)

The solution to this isn’t to tell the loud whiners that their exact fears are true. It’s to divorce ourselves from the notion that being a man is determined by penis/testicle size, or even by having them at all. By telling the bigots that their worst fears are true, we’re tacitly endorsing their bigotry as legitimate, when we should be doing the exact opposite of that.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Counterpoint: it's the hate that makes them compensate?

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Testicle size and reproductive potency are entirely unrelated to penis size, for all the men out there. And if you only ever have one partner at a time that you want to make babies with, you don’t really need to be a super stud in the testicle department. You just need regular sexual contact with your lady half.

But this shows that even if you do want all the ladies, large testicles don’t matter.

(Aside; people with breeder fetishes who impregnate multiple women are fucking gross and weird. Musk is one such and just.. eew.)

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

It's not about the actual size, it's more like a mindset

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not the size that counts, it's how you use it.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

It’s the compatibility with a partner imo, the match is everything - the technical details are mostly irrelevant once events take place

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

this (the study) is about the crystal balls, not the magic wand.