this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
741 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74345 readers
2695 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This is 100% capitalism. It's not free market to have a goverment-enforced monopoly.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (9 children)

This is textbook late stage free market ideals at work. This is how the free market always ends.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (7 children)

X - ~~The system is broken.~~

✅ - The system is working exactly as intended and must be destroyed.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

When did it start?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ConsistentParadox@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You are correct. There would be no copyrights or patents in a free market.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Or trade secrets. "Perfect information" is a bitch. Not to speak of "perfectly rational actors": Say goodbye to advertisement, too, we'd have to outlaw basically all of it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Trade secrets don't need to be enforced much by law. You can create an ad hoc trade secret regime by simply keeping your secret between a few key employees. As it happens, there are some laws that go beyond that to help companies keep the secret, but that only extends something that could happen naturally.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To get closer to the free market there would have to be a duty to disclose any- and everything that's now a trade secret, no matter how easily kept. To not just get closer but actually get there we all would need to be telepathic. As said, perfect information is a bitch of a concept.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Are you telling me that the axioms behind the simplistic model are wrong?? shocked-pikachu.jpg

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

What's government enforced about it? Is ARM the only allowed chip designer for cellphones?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (26 children)

That's not a government enforced monopoly. A government enforced monopoly means nobody else is allowed in the market. Like utility companies.

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Lots of Utilities are consumer cooperatives which is funnily enough Socialist, but the people working there wouldn't like to hear that.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)