this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
325 points (98.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40313 readers
271 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How so? 40%-ish is actually pretty good!

I'm also in the "no" bucket, but I've contributed bug reports and do intend to donate soonish now that I use more visible projects (used to just be minidlna, BTRFS, and openSUSE). I only added Jellyfin a few months ago, and I do intend to donate since I don't intend to report bugs or contribute code.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

True, it’s a good percentage, and probably better than most free software. That said, given the communities the self hosted apps support, their excitement for the products, and for some the essential nature of some of these apps, it would be nice to see the yes/no number more 50/50 at least.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm more interested in dollar amounts. Are people sending $5 every now and then, or is there more consistent funding?

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have subscribed to a couple projects on github (the recurring payment thing) and purchased the optional immich license. I think the immich license is a great model, and more projects should do it.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed. Grayjay has something similar, though it's not actually FOSS (it's source-available though). I'm happy to pay for software, but donating somehow has a different feel to it and doesn't feel as "necessary." So yes, an optional license fee would be awesome for more projects and could encourage more people to actually pay.

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I love that it doesn't unlock any features, but it does prominently display in the app as "activated" or whatever. It feels like "yeah, I have paid my portion, I am now entitled to use this forever guilt-free"

[–] unrushed233@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are people sending $5 every now and then

That's still better than nothing I guess

Sure, but it doesn't really pay the bills.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I don't wanna ask if and how much individuals contributed to the ones that host their instances ;)