this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
203 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 104 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Had to read the article to find out if the headline was describing a good trend or a bad trend. I'm so old 👴

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So good trend or bad trend?

I can't read the article, does anyone have an archive link?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good trend.

Why it matters: The consequences are steeper for those supporting former President Trump.

By the numbers: 43% of people between the ages of 18 and 34 say they’d have a more negative view of a date if told they voted for Trump, according to a new Generation Lab poll.

17% say they’d have a more positive view, and 40% say the information would make no difference.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The 17% is worrying, but that 40% is worse.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The 17% is worrying

Agreed

but that 40% is worse

I'm assuming those 40% just want to get laid and that's all they care about. Lol, I'm not young, but I remember being young.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Keep in mind Trumpers hate birth control and that one night stand might turn to an 18 year marathon with a crazy parent.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Do we know how many of the 40% were dudes?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What happens when you attempt to read the article? It's an Axios article. Free with no paywall.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not OP, but for me a window popped up and asked for my email, without any button or other option to opt out/make it go away. I got around it by using “Reader” Mode.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Hmm. On my phone, the link just opens the article in a browser.

It has an annoying nagwall asking you to sign up with an email, but that doesn't show up if javascript is disabled or if using reader mode on your browser. It's also easy enough to get rid of by using developer tools in your browser if you're a bit tech minded.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right? How am I supposed to know what "left" implies in some random app's context?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Left and right are a de facto standard in dating apps. It's a terrible UI but they all do it now.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Smartphones didn't even exist last time I was dating.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The thing that trips me up, as a dinosaur, is whether "swipe left" refers to the direction your hand moves or the direction that the viewport is traveling. If I scroll by moving my finger to the left, now I'm looking at stuff that was previously on my right.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

In tinder when you swipe, the picture itself moves, not the whole screen.

[–] ZeroPoke@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have this issue with my stove top, which burner goes to with nob/diagram. Does the picture line flat or flip over. I only every end up using the one with both high and low cause it's easy to tell which it is.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Does the picture line flat or flip over

I'm gonna need a drawing or video to describe this in 3d terms because it makes little sense

The burners should be in a representation that when looking at them dead-on you're looking at them as you would the burners top-down

So if you squat down and make the burner icon eye-level to you, then stand up and look down at the burners at a 90 degree angle down, that's how they line up

A | B

C | D

If that's your image then A is the back-left burner on your stovetop, and D would be the one closest to you on the right

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am a weirdo and always get things backwards that the rest of the population has no trouble with.

Righty-tighty, lefty-loosey made no sense when I was a kid because I focused on the bottom of the thing I was spinning instead of the top.

Same with the stove. Wtf is the "front" burner? I mapped the four burners to the four seats of a car in my head, and I thought the front burner would be the ones farther away from me. 🫨

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I mapped the four burners to the four seats of a car in my head, and I thought the front burner would be the ones farther away from me

That's absolutely right, but you forgot to account for the fact that the stove doesn't face the same way you do, you're facing it and it is facing you, like a head on car collision

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

And why are they stealing it? I don't even know where to start planning a caper involving left theft. Guess I could start from the right...

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, I met my (now) wife over 20 years ago. I blissfully missed app dating and I always make sure she wears her seatbelt and what-not so that never changes.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

always make sure she wears her seatbelt and what-not

Got a good brand recommendation for what-nots? My wife's been asking for one.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

I usually check Etsy, but you can often find good ones thrifting too.

[–] ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

"wears her seatbelt"?