this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
203 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2598 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 104 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Had to read the article to find out if the headline was describing a good trend or a bad trend. I'm so old 👴

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So good trend or bad trend?

I can't read the article, does anyone have an archive link?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good trend.

Why it matters: The consequences are steeper for those supporting former President Trump.

By the numbers: 43% of people between the ages of 18 and 34 say they’d have a more negative view of a date if told they voted for Trump, according to a new Generation Lab poll.

17% say they’d have a more positive view, and 40% say the information would make no difference.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The 17% is worrying, but that 40% is worse.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The 17% is worrying

Agreed

but that 40% is worse

I'm assuming those 40% just want to get laid and that's all they care about. Lol, I'm not young, but I remember being young.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Keep in mind Trumpers hate birth control and that one night stand might turn to an 18 year marathon with a crazy parent.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Do we know how many of the 40% were dudes?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What happens when you attempt to read the article? It's an Axios article. Free with no paywall.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not OP, but for me a window popped up and asked for my email, without any button or other option to opt out/make it go away. I got around it by using “Reader” Mode.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Hmm. On my phone, the link just opens the article in a browser.

It has an annoying nagwall asking you to sign up with an email, but that doesn't show up if javascript is disabled or if using reader mode on your browser. It's also easy enough to get rid of by using developer tools in your browser if you're a bit tech minded.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right? How am I supposed to know what "left" implies in some random app's context?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Left and right are a de facto standard in dating apps. It's a terrible UI but they all do it now.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Smartphones didn't even exist last time I was dating.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The thing that trips me up, as a dinosaur, is whether "swipe left" refers to the direction your hand moves or the direction that the viewport is traveling. If I scroll by moving my finger to the left, now I'm looking at stuff that was previously on my right.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

In tinder when you swipe, the picture itself moves, not the whole screen.

[–] ZeroPoke@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have this issue with my stove top, which burner goes to with nob/diagram. Does the picture line flat or flip over. I only every end up using the one with both high and low cause it's easy to tell which it is.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Does the picture line flat or flip over

I'm gonna need a drawing or video to describe this in 3d terms because it makes little sense

The burners should be in a representation that when looking at them dead-on you're looking at them as you would the burners top-down

So if you squat down and make the burner icon eye-level to you, then stand up and look down at the burners at a 90 degree angle down, that's how they line up

A | B

C | D

If that's your image then A is the back-left burner on your stovetop, and D would be the one closest to you on the right

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

And why are they stealing it? I don't even know where to start planning a caper involving left theft. Guess I could start from the right...

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, I met my (now) wife over 20 years ago. I blissfully missed app dating and I always make sure she wears her seatbelt and what-not so that never changes.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

always make sure she wears her seatbelt and what-not

Got a good brand recommendation for what-nots? My wife's been asking for one.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

I usually check Etsy, but you can often find good ones thrifting too.

[–] ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

"wears her seatbelt"?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I was dating hot and heavy in 2020-2023, on several dating sites. Women either said they weren't political or not interested. That's a big, fat flag, "If you're Republican, STFU about it." Others simply stated that MAGA need not apply.

I was talking to a potential date (who turned out great!) and joked that I was something of a redneck.

"Uh... exactly how redneck?"

"I loathe Trump if that's what you're asking."

"OK. Whew. Thanks, just had to check."

And this was in NW Florida, about as conservative an area as it gets. There were very few women openly looking for conservative men, and I only remember a single MAGA nut.

Related note; I can't tell you how many women I met, including my wife, who said they would go on a date and the man would start going off about Trump bullshit. Imagine that. On a first date.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 month ago

Better the first date than 6 months in.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I post on a message board that has absolutely nothing to do with politics. Of course, there are always topics that come up that someone has a political opinion about, so occasionally the board devolves into some political bickering.

However, at some point, I realized every time one of the posts became political it was because a conservative brought politics into it. I thought maybe it was just my bias and overlooked it when it was a leftwing/liberal. . .but nope, every time I noticed it getting political from there on out, it was always, without a doubt, a conservative who had to bring their politics into it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago

I wish they'd all fucking vote...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Related note; I can’t tell you how many women I met, including my wife, who said they would go on a date and the man would start going off about Trump bullshit. Imagine that. On a first date.

I find that the magabrainz will even start up with that shit on an elevator if they can. If you think of con memes as a brainworm from another planet that is seeking to infect the entire human race, it makes a lot more sense...they seek to spread that shit in nearly every interaction, even with people they have just met. Invasion of the Body Snatchers was supposedly about the red scare, but I find it far more like the way the redcoats behave...

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You really went turbo mode with that dating, huh

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you aim to catch a fish, it's best to sink several hooks in the water. Same for job hunting. The neighbors were making fun of me bringing home so many women. I was looking for a solid relationship!

Get past 40-45 with all your hair and teeth, don't be (too) fat, have a decent personality and interests, can't beat 'em off with a stick. Problem is, most all of us are damaged by then. :(

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was referring to the alacrity at which you tied the knot.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well yeah, anyone who votes for Trump is admitting that they view a rapist and lying narcissist who cheated on his pregnant wife as a leader. Who the fuck in their right mind would want to date that?

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 62 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think it's brilliant that people publicise their political affiliations - it's like a big red flag to either avoid certain topics... or just avoid them altogether.

It's like Social Interaction for Dummies.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last time I was on the dating market some of these people popped up on the dating app. Holy hell and it were always the maniacs that had to make their dumbassery public.

My favourite was that young lady who was extremely anti vax and tried to make it a “my body my choice” kind of thing. Everything read like she died on that hill a couple of times already.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's something that often occurred to me when I saw some antima/antiva Karen during Peak Covid - I felt sorry for anyone that was their SO, most especially if they were married to them, assuming they weren't down for that level of crazy.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not a difficult thing to sniff out. You just have to mention something innocuous like toilet paper and suddenly you'll know more or less which side of center that person is on.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Good to start with the important questions: Toilet paper! Facing inwards or outwards?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ever since donnie it became something almost impossible to avoid finding out. Most redhats would out themselves pretty quickly. And then Covid happened, and with things like masks and vaccines, the crazies found it nearly impossible to hide themselves...I'm sure there are still a few being quiet, but I think once the fauxbrain really takes hold, they seem to find it impossible to NOT broadcast their assholery.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 month ago

I never swiped right on a lady firing a gun. Or taking a picture in the mirror of a public bathroom. Not the same thing. I just remembered the second one as I mentioned the first.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's kind of like that stupid red hat the gomers like to wear (when they feel they can - I notice a lot of them don't wear it all the time, though - imagine that. It's almost like they know what that hat really means to normal Americans.)

When I see someone wearing that, now I know it's someone I can just skip over. It's like wearing a "do not talk to me" shirt.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah well didn’t stop boebert

[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're correct - it was the ushers that stopped boebert.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I should not be browsing lemmy when I’m eating. Thanks bazus. You win this one lol

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Having experienced an awful divorce from someone not even a Trump voter -

A Trump voter is a good indication that they aren't very intelligent people, and you're gonna have a bad time.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternative headline: "This Just In: The Youth Swipe (and Skew Politically) Left, But Will They Pokemon-Go To The Polls?"

According to the study in the article, maybe not? While 43% of those surveyed would feel negatively if their potential hookup was voting Trump, 40% wouldn't care; and 65% don't even give a shit if their next date plans to sit out the next election.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the youth still play Pokémon go? That game is almost a decade old at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

My boomer trait is that I never did online dating and I don't know which swipe is the good direction.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

When my wife and I split up due to the pressures of early COVID and I entered the dating scene again this was super common. Women straight up having "if you voted for trump/wear a red hat/like maga/etc. fuck off"

Girl I really gelled with and I went on a little date and within 5m of walking down the street she'd confirmed in person I wasn't some secret maga dickhead and was so relieved she went on a rant about them that ended in her yelling "fuck Donald Trump" at full volume in frustration

I am so not surprised it's gotten more common

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe trump voters shouldn't multiply?

load more comments
view more: next ›