this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
869 points (97.8% liked)

Games

32654 readers
1486 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if its under GPL couldn't they be forced to disclose the source code?

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only if they made modifications

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What, where do you get that? Any publicly conveyed copies of gpl-licensed software must make their source code available, and be published under the same license. This is true regardless of modifications.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I could be wrong and I'm more then welcome to being proven that. But wouldn't this be like asking me to redistribute the whole process of running ZSNES on linux? Seems pretty infeasible.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be more accurate to say it's like requiring you to make the source code for ZSNES available if you were distributing copies of ZSNES.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's a fair correction