this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
-1 points (48.8% liked)

News

23153 readers
3299 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand the concept of closed-off borders.

They cannot leave even if Hamas told them to get the fuck out now or they'll kill them all.

Israel is the one controlling that, not Hamas.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Deleted, I misread the comment. Source saying that Israel controls whether they stay or leave?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't say they would.

Please read more carefully:

They cannot leave even if Hamas told them to get the fuck out now or they’ll kill them all.

I am still waiting for you to quote me defending Hamas.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rewrote the above comment, my mistake for misinterpreting. I'm still waiting for you to quote me saying you're defending Hamas.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fact that Israel’s actions are despicable doesn’t mean you have to defend Hamas.
They’re literally walking over Palestinian children’s corpses to stay in power.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dude, read who wrote that comment

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm sorry, you're right. You didn't.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, seriously?

Source saying that Israel controls whether they stay or leave?

How exactly do you think borders work?

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Has Israel stated they would not let refugees leave? Say Egypt unilaterally opens the Rafah crossing, Israel would stop them from leaving?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do they have to state it when they clearly aren't?

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because then it's unsourced opinion/speculation. Bickering between Egypt and Israel aside, if Egypt unilaterally opened their side of the Rafah crossing, Israel has said they would not let refugees leave?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again, they don't need to say it.

They're still stationed at the border between Gaza and Egypt. They could walk away and leave it up to Egypt.

They aren't.

Because they don't want anyone to leave.

Actions speak louder than words.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You stating it doesn't make it true, that's where evidence comes in. I can state that Egypt's actions demonstrate the same, they could just walk away. And with just as much evidence as you provided.

I understand this is your personal opinion, and that there is no evidence supporting your claims of Israel's intentions to not let refugees leave, even to Egypt. ~~I won't be continuing this discussion with you.~~

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not an opinion. It's a fact. Israeli troops are stationed at the border between Gaza (not their country) and Egypt.

They do not have to be there. Again, not their country.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A "fact" you just can't seem to source.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, are you claiming there aren't IDF troops at the border between Gaza and Egypt? Really?

I mean Israel doesn't make a secret of it.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/egypt-showing-flexibility-on-idf-staying-along-its-gaza-border-to-block-arms-smuggling/

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You know what, I'll keep going :)

Quote where I said there aren't IDF troops. Because it would be a shame if you were lying about what I said. This is where evidence (not opinion) comes in.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What I said is that they should be allowed to leave and they aren't being allowed to because they can't cross a border due to an invading force controlling it.

Israel is controlling a border that is not theirs to control. That is not in dispute. Therefore there is only one nation that has control over who gets in and out of Gaza. The idea that they would control the border and give freedom of passage is silly.

Have you seen a mass refugee exodus? Do you think Gazans want to stay there and die? Are you under the impression that Hamas somehow controls virtually the entire Gazan population to the point that basically none of them have fled?

This is ludicrous. You must just be trolling at this point.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I specifically asked you to quote me saying that there are no IDF troops at the border, and you failed to, and I reject you mischaracterizing my argument. You very specifically said "Because they don’t want anyone to leave." and have yet to provide evidence. Reframing your unsourced claim as "they can't cross a border due to an invading force controlling it" is disingenuous and in bad faith, and also not substantiated as it similarly implies without evidence Israel's intentions.

Thank you for posting another comment devoid of a source for your claims. The "source" you posted previously does not support your assertion of Israel's intentions. Injection of this is a strawman, followed by your unsubstantiated opinion of what it means to you personally. You have yet to prove Israel would not let refugees leave to Egypt.

I am in no way trolling.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have no idea what your argument even is at that point.

All I said is that they should be allowed to leave Gaza if they want to.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That isn't all you said, your comments are all here on display for everyone to read. And I'm very clear on what you are saying.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes they are:

And no you're not. What the fuck is your point?

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow, that was the entire conversation? Where was I getting this idea that you were claiming Israel would not let refugees leave to Egypt?

Oh, that was exactly what you said... "Because they don’t want anyone to leave."

And yes, I am. Because I read what you said.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Israel would not let refugees leave to Egypt

Israel controls the border between Gaza and Egypt.

Why are there not refugees crossing that border? If it isn't Israel, please explain who is stopping refugees from crossing the border.

[–] fukhueson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm supposed to provide proof for my response to your claim, yet you aren't required to source your original claim of "Because they don’t want anyone to leave"? No no :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim, especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.[1] This is also stated in Hitchens's razor, which declares that "what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence." Carl Sagan proposed a related criterion – "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" – which is known as the Sagan standard.[2]

...

One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by committing a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance. It occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.[8][9]

I'm not going to be engaging with you now, or in the future. This is extraordinarily bad form, and a huge waste of time.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Dude, this is basic logic. One party controls the border, therefore that party is the one that has the power to let people in and out.

People aren't being let out.