Starfield steam page for the DLC currently shows eight user review score of 41%, making this one of the worst Bethesda DLC's released of all time. This is so horribly, shockingly bad for Bethesda, because it shows as a gaming company, they are no longer capable of delivering a really good gaming experience as they had in the past. Some of the reviews sum up quite nicely what is wrong with this DLC....

Less content than any skyrim DLC. Less than The Fallout 4 story DLCs. Doesn't change of the complaints people had with the base game, writing is still at a 4th grade level.

Quick: If you are looking to buy my answer is no, you aren't missing much content. I was really hoping to enjoy this DLC. Took about 4 hours for the main story and maybe 2 more hours to 100% the achievements.

These two reviews I think really summed up what Starfield has become, $70 for an AAAA title that has extremely little buy-in from the community, horrifically low amount of replayability and can be breezed through easily. It's mind-boggling to see this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Microsoft really knows how to pick the winners, don't they?

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they are a reverse midas. Anything they touch doesn't turn into gold but into shit

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 1 month ago

Mierdas touch

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

They do ESO makes anything else the company does largely irrelevant. Same as Blizzard back when Activision bought them.