this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
468 points (96.4% liked)

News

23648 readers
2509 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everyone knows that electric vehicles are supposed to be better for the planet than gas cars. That's the driving reason behind a global effort to transition toward batteries.

But what about the harms caused by mining for battery minerals? And coal-fired power plants for the electricity to charge the cars? And battery waste? Is it really true that EVs are better?

The answer is yes. But Americans are growing less convinced.

The net benefits of EVs have been frequently fact-checked, including by NPR. "No technology is perfect, but the electric vehicles are going to offer a significant benefit as compared to the internal combustion engine vehicles," Jessika Trancik, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told NPR this spring.

It's important to ask these questions about EVs' hidden costs, Trancik says. But they have been answered "exhaustively"


her word


and a widerange of organizations have confirmed that EVs still beat gas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Put them in a sealed room with a gas engine running and you'll see how fast they realize that they're cleaner

[–] Mcdolan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fair, but the first rebuttal is going to be "go into a sealed room with a coal fire burning"

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The argument is that all you're doing is moving the carbon emissions from the car directly in your vicinity to the coal-fired power plant a long distance away. Move that same coal-fired power plant into the sealed room, and suddenly it's no longer far away, and the "unclean" nature of the electric car, so the thought process goes, becomes obvious.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's the thought process if you just stop thinking when you get to a point that reaffirms one's biases. If you continue down that train of thought you'd realize it's a lot easier to regulate and monitor the emissions of a coal power plant than it is every single car on the road. Plus you don't need to use coal to make electricity.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

I'd happily hang out in a sealed room with a nuclear reactor.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Isn't the whole point that the gas engine equivalent is just in somebody else's room though?

In any case, I'll take whatever partial climate wins we can get.

[–] overcast5348@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Solar, wind, and nuclear energy: are we a joke to you?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if we assume all the electricity is coming from carbon sources (there's no need for any of it to be carbon sources) it's still more efficient because power plants are way better at turning that chemical energy into electricity. Even with the losses in the lines, charging, and in your motors, electric cars are still significantly more efficient on a mile per kg CO2 basis than gas cars. Throw some solar panels on your roof and they become essentially carbonless.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's really easy to understand why too. You completely waste most of the heat energy you produce in IC engines. They're incredibly inefficient and always will be.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, what is it, 70% energy lost to heat in an ICE?